“Climate Smart” Beef Was Never More Than a Marketing Fantasy
Beef production results in almost nine times as many greenhouse gas emissions as chicken or fish.Brandon Bell/Getty/Grist
This story was originally published by Grist and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
Shoppers have long sought ways to make more sustainable choices at the supermarket—and for good reason: Our food system is responsible for a third of global greenhouse gas emissions. The vast majority of emissions from agriculture come from raising cows on industrial farms in order to sell burgers, steak, and other beef products. Beef production results in two and a half times as many greenhouse gases as lamb, and almost nine times as many as chicken or fish; its carbon footprint relative to other sources of protein, like cheese, eggs, and tofu, is even higher.
If you want to have a lighter impact on the planet, you could try eating less beef. (Just try it!) Otherwise, a series of recent lawsuits intends make it easier for consumers to discern what’s sustainable and what’s greenwashing by challenging the world’s largest meat processors on their climate messaging.
Tyson, which produces 20 percent of beef, chicken, and pork in the United States, has agreed to drop claims that the company has a plan to achieve “net zero” emissions by 2050........





















Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Sabine Sterk
Penny S. Tee
John Nosta
Mark Travers Ph.d
Gilles Touboul
Daniel Orenstein