War is the last refuge of failing states, but in Pakistan it often seems to be the first hobby of men who confuse uniforms with omniscience. When politics decays, legitimacy thins, and yesterday’s “strategic assets” develop the bad manners of independent thought, Rawalpindi reaches for the same old script: bomb a frontier, hold a briefing, and pray that smoke can pass for doctrine. It is a touching faith in language, really. If enough dead civilians are described as “infrastructure,” perhaps history itself will agree to be redacted.

The bombing of a rehabilitation hospital in Kabul, with Afghan officials claiming 400 dead, should have ended at least one moral farce: the idea that mass civilian death becomes tolerable once it is wrapped in the sterile ribbon of national security. Yet the response was as predictable as it was degraded. Some rushed to contest the number, as though arithmetic were the true victim. Others reached for the old catechism of retaliatory excuse-making: they killed ours, therefore ours may kill theirs, preferably with better press management. It is the sort of ethical reasoning one expects from mafia accountants, not states pretending to civilizational seriousness.

None of this means Pakistan lacks genuine security concerns. It plainly does. Militant violence emanating from Afghan territory has exacted a terrible price inside Pakistan, hitting mosques, hospitals, courts, security personnel, and ordinary civilians.

None of this means Pakistan lacks genuine security concerns. It plainly does. Militant violence emanating from Afghan territory has exacted a terrible price inside Pakistan, hitting mosques, hospitals, courts, security personnel, and ordinary civilians.

But that is precisely why the current performance is so intellectually bankrupt. A state that spent decades cultivating militant infrastructures does not get to pose as an innocent bystander when the machinery of militancy mutates, multiplies, and turns inward. Blowback is not a cosmic mystery. It is policy returning home without an appointment.

READ: About half of Iranian missiles fired at Israel since start of war carried cluster munitions

The deeper problem is not simply hypocrisy. It is strategic infantilism masquerading as realism. The Taliban were never disqualifying when they were useful. Their real offense was never extremism, brutality, or medieval governance. The offense was sovereignty. Islamabad could tolerate almost anything except disobedience. A proxy is charming only so long as it remains a proxy. The moment it develops a will of its own, the sponsor rediscovers international law, counterterror doctrine, and righteous indignation in one miraculous burst of enlightenment. Yet this bilateral tragedy sits inside a far wider regional disorder, and that is what makes it truly ominous. West Asia is not merely unstable; it is being systematically reorganized through war, fragmentation, and permanent emergency. Gaza has been turned into a laboratory of annihilation. Lebanon has been dragged into the same violent orbit. Iran now confronts a criminal U.S.-Israeli war that strips away the last pretense that this regional order is about peace, deterrence, or law. The pattern is brutally clear: pulverize, destabilize, securitize, then lecture the rubble about moderation. Afghanistan and Pakistan are caught within that machinery whether they admit it or not.

The billions of dollars’ worth of weapons left behind after the American withdrawal did not dissolve into poetry. They entered a region already saturated with proxies, covert channels, ideological militias, and states that have perfected the art of denying authorship while enjoying the consequences.

The billions of dollars’ worth of weapons left behind after the American withdrawal did not dissolve into poetry. They entered a region already saturated with proxies, covert channels, ideological militias, and states that have perfected the art of denying authorship while enjoying the consequences.

Empire’s genius, if one must flatter it, lies not in choosing one side cleanly but in keeping enough actors armed, frightened, and mutually enraged that no durable sovereignty can breathe.

READ: Trump suggests ‘finishing off what’s left’ of Iran

That is why the present crisis cannot be solved by military swagger and televised vagueness. Pakistan’s public still does not know what victory is supposed to mean. Is the goal to destroy TTP camps, coerce Kabul, downgrade the Taliban militarily, or simply perform toughness for domestic consumption? The ambiguity is useful, of course. If the objective remains undefined, every failure can be repackaged as patience, and every escalation advertised as resolve. A serious alternative would require something Pakistan’s security state finds almost as offensive as civilian oversight: political thought. That means transparency before parliament, consultation with border communities, engagement with tribal elders, honest scrutiny of past policy, and a regional diplomatic framework that treats Afghanistan not as a rebellious backyard but as a sovereign neighbor. It also means Kabul must be pressured to ensure its territory is not used as a launching pad for militancy. The real danger is no longer only at the border. It is in the governing imagination that keeps mistaking force for intelligence and repetition for strategy. States can survive error; they rarely survive addiction to error. And that is the abyss now in view: not merely another round of violence, but a ruling logic so intoxicated by its own myths that it can no longer distinguish control from collapse. When that happens, the smoke does not conceal failure. It announces it.

OPINION: Banality cannot swim: Iran and evil on the high seas of empire

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

© Middle East Monitor