menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

For AI governance, hard laws over hollow words

48 0
18.09.2026

On September 10, Anthropic published a 154-page threat intelligence report documenting nine months of AI misuse — December 2025 to August 2026. Two days later, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a blog post calling on the industry to slow the development of frontier AI. Within hours, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Elon Musk both agreed. Read together, these two documents tell us everything we need to know about where AI governance must go next.

The misuse cases Anthropic documented span seven harm categories and range from state-sponsored operations to lone actors. The transparency is commendable.

But the report’s deeper significance is structural. AI is no longer merely a tool that generates harmful content. It is now an orchestration layer — connected to other software, running multiple stages of an operation simultaneously, enabling sophisticated attacks with fewer people and less expertise than ever before. Anthropic calls this “uplift”: The AI capability boost measured in speed, scale, and depth of harm. A flagged Bangladesh disinformation operation was almost entirely automated — AI generated the content, other software turned it into videos, scheduling algorithms published them at optimised times. One person, 29 accounts, 1,500 fabricated stories. That is uplift.

And what Anthropic caught is almost certainly a subset of what was attempted. Anthropic also acknowledges that for its most capable current models, it can no longer assure that a sophisticated actor could not........

© Indian Express