The most important obligation of a democratically elected government is not merely to govern; it is to speak truthfully to those from whom it derives its legitimacy. Elections confer authority, but they also impose an ethical burden: the burden of honesty. A government may fail because of adverse circumstances, institutional constraints, or inherited crises. Democracies are often forgiving of failure. What they find difficult to forgive is evasion.It is in this spirit- not hostility but democratic concern- that I write to you.Nearly two years into your government, a peculiar paradox confronts Jammu and Kashmir. You received a decisive electoral mandate in a political environment where democratic faith itself had become fragile. Citizens did not merely vote for a political party; they voted for the possibility that representative government could once again become meaningful. They entrusted you with hope at a time when hope had become a scarce political resource.

Yet today, public discourse is increasingly dominated by a single refrain: that the elected government can do little because Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union Territory, and because substantial authority rests with the Lieutenant Governor.This argument deserves careful scrutiny- not because constitutional constraints are imaginary, but because constitutional constraints cannot become a permanent substitute for political accountability.

No serious observer disputes that the post-2019 constitutional arrangement has fundamentally altered the architecture of governance. The elected government does not possess the authority enjoyed by a full-fledged state. Questions relating to policing, public order, and certain administrative matters remain outside your government’s direct control. The duality of authority between the elected executive and the Lieutenant Governor creates genuine administrative........

© Greater Kashmir