“The sacrifice of dissent is without doubt the death of politics, the sacrifice of a concurring but dissenting assent is the pathway to such imminent death”

In contemporary India, there is no shortage of political speakers if there is any, it is shortage of political authorship.Political voices are widespread on television debates, across social media platforms, and on the campaign trails. Politicians speak frequently, but the ability to be an independent thinker is shrinking. What is missingis not expression, but ownership of ideas. This reflects a structural transformation in contemporary politics in India: the transition from political actors as authors of ideas to coordinators of political parties, and this situation gives birth to the emergence of coordinator politics.It is a mode in which political actors primarily transmit centrally produced messages rather than generating independent insights.

The above is in stark distinction with the times in which political leadership demanded not only authority but also articulation. Leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru, Ram Manohar Lohia, and Atal Bihari Vajpayee were not merely representatives of their parties but even more significantly they acted as interpreters of their time and space. They engaged publicly with ideas, expressed disagreement, and influenced the ideological direction of their organisations. Their speech reflected intellectual engagement and personal conviction rather than organisational conformity. The contemporary political cultureis organised differently. Political parties function as highly centralised entities in which strategy, messaging, and communication are........

© Greater Kashmir