03-16-2026THE NEW WAY WE WORK

Is there anyone middle managers can trust?

In too many organizations, the answer is: no one.

A middle manager sits in a 1:1 with their boss. They nod along to strategic priorities they already know are unrealistic. The deadlines don’t match the staffing plan. The “new initiative” competes with the last “top priority.” The team is already stretched thin. But the manager doesn’t say it—not plainly—because honesty can be misread as incompetence, negativity, or a lack of readiness for the next level.

Two hours later, that same manager is in a team meeting projecting confidence about those same priorities. They translate contradictions into something coherent, reassure direct reports who are already anxious, and say, “We’ll figure it out,” while privately wondering how.

Later, at lunch with peers, they compare notes on workload and shifting expectations. Everyone laughs in that awkward “we’re fine” way. No one admits they’re drowning—because even peer relationships can feel political when resources are scarce.

Here’s the question we’re not asking: Who can middle managers actually be honest with?

In too many organizations, the answer is: no one.

That’s not a personality problem or a resilience issue. It’s a design issue—one I call Organizational Latchkey Syndrome: a workplace reality where middle managers are handed responsibility and expected to “figure it out” with limited authority, limited support, and limited psychological safety.

As a licensed psychotherapist, I see this pattern constantly: organizations demanding emotional intelligence from people inside emotionally unintelligent systems. It’s like asking someone to practice healthy attachment in a relationship that punishes vulnerability. And because middle managers are the emotional and relational bridge between strategy and execution, Organizational Latchkey Syndrome doesn’t just burn people out. It quietly breaks culture.

Expedia CEO Ariane Gorin on Turning AI Into a Competitive Advantage

© Fast Company