America Has Undergone Multiple Radical Transformations: The U.S. is not a continuous constitutional republic but has effectively been reborn several times (Sixth Republic today), each marked by major shifts in power centralization, often driven by crises, wars, and elite incentives, while maintaining the outward symbols of the original system.

From Decentralized Confederation to Surveillance Superstate: The evolution moved from the loose Articles of Confederation (First Republic), through constitutional federalism and post-Civil War consolidation, to Progressive administrative state, New Deal welfare-warfare Leviathan, and now a post-9/11 national security-administrative apparatus that dominates via bureaucracy, surveillance, fiat money, and executive power.

The Founding Myth Obscures Reality: Clinging to the idea of an “eternal republic” hides how consent, federalism, and limited government have been progressively eroded. True understanding requires recognizing these structural changes rather than romanticizing continuity, to realistically assess current governance and reclaim decentralized, self-governing principles.

July 4, 2026 marked 250 years since the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Should this historic anniversary have evoked unabashed patriotic celebration or cause for reflection? Inspired by Joseph Solis-Mullen’s “The Sixth Republic,” I argue for the latter.

America wasn’t born as the eternal constitutional republic your civics teacher swore it was. It has been reborn—radically remade—multiple times, each iteration shedding more of the Founders’ restraints on centralized power while wrapping itself in the same red, white, and blue myths.

Unlike the French, who frankly number their republics after each upheaval, Americans cling to the comforting fiction of seamless continuity. The Constitution’s text lingers as a sacred prop, but the operating system of power has been upgraded, patched, and hijacked several times.

This isn’t nostalgia for some golden age; it’s a clear-eyed autopsy to understand why the system feels so alien to its original design—and what that means for those living inside the latest version.

One might counter that the Constitution’s text, though amended, remains intact, thereby proving continuity, not rebirth. Article V remains; the three branches persist; the Bill of Rights still binds. Are these not phases of a single republic, evolved rather than replaced?

This formalist objection mistakes the vessel for the voyage. The presidency of 1789 commanded a few hundred clerks and a tiny militia; today’s executive directs over a million active-duty personnel, a sprawling intelligence apparatus, and issues executive orders with the force of law on matters the Founders left to local sheriffs and state legislatures.

Today’s Constitution endures in theory while the machinery runs on different fuel entirely. Yet America’s founding myth portrays a virtuous people forging an eternal constitutional republic under divine providence and enlightened Founders.

Heterodox scrutiny, drawing on........

© Eurasia Review