Recognition in international politics is rarely an end in itself. More often, it reflects shifting strategic realities in which geography, security, and national interests outweigh legal orthodoxy. States do not establish partnerships simply because international law allows it; they do so when geopolitical conditions make cooperation strategically necessary.

Nowhere is this dynamic more visible than in the Horn of Africa, which has evolved from a peripheral region into one of the world’s most contested geopolitical spaces. Intensifying great-power competition, expanding military footprints, and rising maritime insecurity in the Red Sea have transformed the region into a critical arena for global security and trade.

At the centre of this transformation is the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a chokepoint through which roughly one-tenth of global seaborne trade passes. Any disruption carries immediate consequences for energy markets, supply chains, and global stability. Recent attacks on commercial shipping have further elevated the strategic importance of securing this corridor and strengthened the search for reliable regional partners.

Within this environment, Somaliland has emerged as a strategically located and relatively stable actor along the Gulf of Aden. Since 1991, it has maintained internal stability, built functioning institutions, conducted competitive elections, and developed security structures despite lacking international recognition. While its legal status remains contested, its functional trajectory has positioned it as a reliable regional actor.

Israel, meanwhile, brings advanced capabilities in water management, agriculture, cybersecurity, intelligence, and defense technology, alongside an increasingly pragmatic foreign policy shaped by regional security challenges.

Against this backdrop, the key question is no longer whether Somaliland fits conventional diplomatic categories, but whether Israel and Somaliland possess complementary strategic assets that justify deeper cooperation in a system increasingly driven by geopolitical calculation rather than diplomatic formality.

I. Geography as Strategic Currency

Geography remains one of the most constant determinants of international politics. Governments and alliances change, but geography continues to shape long-term strategic behavior. As Nicholas Spykman argued, geography is the most fundamental factor in foreign policy because it cannot be altered.

The Horn of Africa illustrates this clearly. Situated between Africa, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, it forms a gateway linking global maritime trade routes. Its importance has increased as energy flows, shipping lanes, and naval competition converge in the Red Sea.

Somaliland occupies a key stretch of coastline along the Gulf of Aden,........

© Eurasia Review