menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Tina Peters' 9 Year Prison Sentence Has Been Thrown Out in Massive Victory for the 70-Year-Old Election Integrity Advocate and for America

14 0
03.04.2026

Watch: Cocky Anti-MAGA DoorDash Driver Begs for Help After Hateful Comments Leave Him Canceled

Rising Political Star Murdered Just Before She Was Set to Announce Her Run for Congress

$5 Million Somali Fraudster Will Live Like a Queen Thanks to Order from Democrat Nominated Judge Who Was Born in England

Christian Athletes Are Supporting NBA Player Fired for Telling Truth About Homosexuality - But There's a Real Problem With Their Responses Too

Nazi Tattoo-Wearing Democrat Sen. Candidate Previously Talked About Jesus Being a 'Zombie' and Mary a 'Skank'

Priceless Video: Hospice Fraudsters in CA Rip Down Sign, Flee in $200k Mercedes When Nick Shirley Pays 'Friendly' Visit

Trump Announces Plan to Help DHS Workers in Spite of 'Radical Left' Shutdown

Tina Peters' 9 Year Prison Sentence Has Been Thrown Out in Massive Victory for the 70-Year-Old Election Integrity Advocate and for America

How do you get a nine-year prison sentence for something that gets someone else 20 days if you don’t have any prior record? Simple: You have the Wrong Political Beliefs™ and you’re in the state of Colorado.

Thankfully, even Coloradans — particularly the state’s appeals court — seem to believe that’s a bit harsh, and that means that former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters could be out of prison sooner rather than much later.

On Thursday, the appeals court threw out the original sentence handed down to Peters, an election integrity advocate, in 2024 for allowing a conservative activist access to parts of the Mesa County system in an attempt to see if there had been fraud in the 2020 election.

The 3-0 ruling kept Peters’ conviction for the data breach but found that the judge violated Peters’ First Amendment rights by taking her political views into account during sentencing, according to The New York Times.

“The trial court’s comments about Peters’s belief in the existence of 2020 election fraud went beyond relevant considerations for her sentencing,” the judges wrote in their opinion.

“Her offense was not her belief, however misguided the trial court deemed it to be, in the existence of such election fraud; it was her deceitful actions in her attempt to gather evidence of such fraud.”

The sentencing judge in the........

© Western Journalism