menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

NPR Admits That It Could Get the Rich Libs to Pay For Coverage Trashing Conservatives Instead of Forcing Conservatives to Foot the Bill

12 0
22.04.2026

House Democrats Set to 'Abandon' Colleague, Leaving Her Vulnerable to Expulsion: Report

Alert: 26 Christians Kidnapped in 8 Days by Muslims Fulani Terrorists in Nigeria

Trump Says Ceasefire Has Been 'Violated Numerous Times' as Iran Threatens to Deploy 'New Cards on the Battlefield'

Breaking: Leftist Southern Poverty Law Center Under Criminal DOJ Investigation

Pete Hegseth Ends Vaccine Requirement for US Troops: 'That Era of Betrayal Is Over'

Bombshell: GOP Lawmaker Says Thune 'No Longer Considering the SAVE America Act'

Bombshell Indictment: Leftist SPLC 'Secretly Funneled' Over $3 Million to Members of White Supremacist and Extremist Groups

NPR Admits That It Could Get the Rich Libs to Pay For Coverage Trashing Conservatives Instead of Forcing Conservatives to Foot the Bill

NPR’s business model has — or, blessedly, had — always been providing hard-left content to rich urban liberals and forcing everyone, including the conservatives they trashed, to pay for it via their tax dollars.

Not that they’d acknowledge that. NPR’s claim was that they got basically 1 percent of their annual revenue from your tax dollars, then would insist in the next breath they desperately needed that 1 percent.

Both of these were half-truths: A federal entity called NPR only got 1 percent of the public broadcaster’s revenue from tax dollars, but that was just the national organization; when you added up all the subsidies, direct and indirect, to NPR and its stations through other forms of taxpayer largesse, that number was roughly at least a quarter of its operating budget — which it did desperately need under its former business model.

Last May, President Donald Trump signed an executive order cutting off taxpayer funds from going to NPR (and its television cousin, PBS) from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting: “At the very least, Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage,” he said in a statement at the time.

That’s still tied up in the courts, but I’ve been reliably informed by past Democrat presidents that you can do a lot with “a pen” and “a phone,” and I suspect pulling NPR funding through the CPB is probably one of those things.

Even with the money tied up in court, NPR hasn’t really seen any significant diminishment in the quality or the reach of its programming, from what I’ve observed; I’m not sure whether that says more about the quality of NPR’s product or the need........

© Western Journalism