Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation

Articles Business Environment Health Politics Arts & Culture Society

Special Series Hope You’re Well For the Love of the Game Living Rooms In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration Terra Cognita More special series >

For the Love of the Game

In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration

More special series >

Events The Walrus Talks The Walrus Video Room The Walrus Leadership Roundtables The Walrus Leadership Forums Article Club

The Walrus Video Room

The Walrus Leadership Roundtables

The Walrus Leadership Forums

Subscribe Renew your subscription Change your address Magazine Issues Newsletters Podcasts

Renew your subscription

The Walrus Lab Hire The Walrus Lab Amazon First Novel Award

Amazon First Novel Award

Separating from Canada Would Be an Economic Disaster for Alberta

The movement promises endless prosperity. The numbers tell a bleaker story

Stacey Innes, who lives in Spruce Grove, an Edmonton bedroom community, has struggled to find work since she lost her job at Walmart as an overnight shelf stocker. Although she’s since landed a construction job with the company her son works for, she was forced to rely on support from her son and seventy-three-year-old mother to get by between jobs. For her, separation is a no-brainer.

Decode the stories behind the headlines with The Walrus newsletter. Sign up for The Walrus newsletter and get trusted Canadian journalism straight in your inbox.

A sovereign Alberta, she’s certain, will benefit people like her. When she looks at her paycheque, she sees all the taxes that are taken off. In an independent Alberta, she thinks she’d keep more of her money.

“Honestly, I hate this country right now. If I could leave, I would.”

The motivations that have contributed to the separatist movement and Alberta’s sense of grievance in recent years are not especially discrete; it’s more like a nebulous Venn diagram. Simple politics have pushed some people toward separatism. Indeed, the paucity of separatist talk during the time when Stephen Harper was prime minister suggests there’s a significant political component to the idea; when Liberals are in power, people feel more inclined to talk about leaving. Culture also plays a role. When Angus Reid pollsters talked to separatists in February 2026, 86.5 percent said they thought Canada forced Alberta to take in too many immigrants, and 96 percent believed that an independent Alberta would better protect personal freedoms.

But, as with Innes, separatists tend to find the economic arguments particularly seductive. Angus Reid polling shows 96 percent of respondents who want an independent Alberta believe they would be free from economically damaging federal government policies. Separatist leaders promise the elimination of the personal income tax while creating a new provincial sales tax of 5 percent. They also claim Alberta would save $75 billion from no longer paying federal taxes.

Not all separatists promise immediate prosperity, but the argument remains persuasive. Cameron Davies is the leader of the Republican Party of Alberta. “I don’t paint an immediate rosy, utopian picture of what independence looks like,” he says. “Will it be difficult? Yes. Will it be immediate sunshine and rainbows? Probably not. But will it be worth it? Five, ten, fifteen years down the road for your kids and your grandkids? One hundred percent yes.”

Separatists often focus on the idea that Alberta would be far wealthier if Albertans weren’t handing over wads of cash each year to the federal taxman to be disbursed to less well-to-do provinces. This is the anti-equalization argument. Eighty-eight percent of Alberta separatists cite the desire to exit equalization as a reason for their support of separatism, according to Wesley’s polling. Canada’s Constitution Act commits Parliament to ensuring that provinces can provide reasonably comparable public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. So Ottawa shuffles money from “have” provinces to “have-not” provinces.

In 2025, only three provinces did not receive equalization payments: British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. The program is now worth around $26 billion annually. Albertans, who represent about 11.5 percent of the population, contribute around one-sixth of all federal revenues. Its share of the money paid into the equalization program has been estimated at $4.2 billion. In 2021, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation pegged Albertans’ contribution to equalization as $650 per capita.

The Fraser Institute, a free-market think tank, estimates that, between 2007 and 2022, Albertans’ net contribution to federal finances was $244.6 billion—that’s federal taxes and payments paid by Albertans minus the money spent on Albertans by the federal government. It’s a large number. On the equalization program specifically, Alberta has not received equalization payments since 1964–65. The Canadian Taxpayers Federation estimates that the province has received 0.02 percent of the equalization program’s overall spending since it was created in 1957.

“The fact that Alberta has not received equalization payments is not itself a problem,” the Fraser Institute says, “however, it illustrates Alberta’s outsized contribution to the funding of national programs.”

The basic contention made by both separatists and non-separatists who express frustration with Ottawa is that money is flowing out of Alberta to finance other provinces, while Alberta’s main industry, oil and gas, has been hamstrung by punitive federal policies. At the same time, equalization payments, critics argue, keep provinces from developing their own economies and industries because to do so could imperil their receipt of equalization by making the province wealthier. There have long been debates over the way the........

© The Walrus