menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Why Bombing Alone Has Never Toppled a Regime

58 0
03.03.2026

The Principle of Simultaneity:

Why Bombing Alone Has Never Toppled a Regime

Six Historical Cases Reveal the Formula for Regime Change

As bombs fall on Tehran and the news confirms the elimination of dozens of senior Islamic Republic officials—including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—a seductive but dangerous assumption is taking hold: that this is the end of the regime. It is not—at least, not yet. And history tells us exactly why.

Khamenei was the second Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic. If the elimination of a leader alone could bring down a regime, the system should have collapsed when its founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, died in 1989. It did not. We are not dealing with a person. We are dealing with a system—one capable of replacing its leaders and regenerating its command structure. The question, then, is not whether the leader has been removed, but whether the conditions exist for the system itself to collapse.

I believe those conditions can be described in a single concept, what I call the Principle of Simultaneity: the requirement that external pressure and internal action occur at the same time. Without this convergence, neither bombing nor uprising alone has ever succeeded in toppling an authoritarian regime.

The Theoretical Foundation

Gene Sharp, the theorist of civil resistance and author of From Dictatorship to Democracy (1993), established a foundational principle: the power of any government ultimately depends on the obedience and cooperation of its people. When that cooperation is withdrawn, the pillars of power crumble. But Sharp himself acknowledged that this withdrawal of cooperation is most effective when accompanied by structural pressure—whether economic, military, or diplomatic.

Theda Skocpol of Harvard, in her landmark States and Social Revolutions (1979), arrived at the same conclusion from a different angle: revolutions are not made—they are born, at the intersection of external crisis and internal collapse of legitimacy.

Edward Luttwak, the military strategist, offers perhaps the most operationally relevant concept: systemic........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)