menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

There Is No Single Black Democratic Position on Israel

53 0
previous day

What Black political diversity reveals about Israel, Gaza and coalition politics

One sentence in this series deserves an essay of its own: there is no single “Jewish position,” and there is no single “Black position.” The point is easy to affirm in theory and easy to forget in politics, where public discussion often turns communities into blocs. Israel and Gaza provide a useful test because Black Democratic leaders have taken meaningfully different positions while drawing from overlapping commitments to civil rights, international law, Jewish security and Palestinian dignity.

Those differences should not be turned into a ranking of who is more authentically Black, more loyal to the Democratic Party or more morally serious. They are evidence that Black political thought contains competing traditions, constituencies and interpretations of foreign policy. Treating the most pro-Israel Black official or the most pro-Palestinian Black official as the voice of Black America reproduces the very essentialism Black politics has spent generations resisting.

Hakeem Jeffries: Security, Defeat of Hamas and a Two-State Future

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has articulated a strongly pro-Israel position while also emphasizing Palestinian civilian protection and a two-state solution. In an April 2024 statement marking six months since October 7, he reaffirmed Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish democratic state and argued that Hamas should be decisively defeated. In the same statement, he said Israel must conduct the war in accordance with the rules of war, substantially mitigate civilian harm, permit humanitarian aid and ultimately pursue an enduring two-state solution with Palestinian dignity and self-determination.

That combination is important because it resists two common simplifications. Strong support for Israel does not necessarily mean rejection of Palestinian statehood, and concern for Palestinian civilians does not necessarily require adopting a ceasefire-first position. Jeffries’s framework places security and two-state diplomacy within the same argument.

Cory Booker: Defense, International Law and Settler Violence

Cory Booker offers another formulation. In November 2023, he joined Senate colleagues in affirming Israel’s right and obligation to defend itself against Hamas while also insisting that Israel had an obligation under international law to minimize civilian harm and allow humanitarian aid to reach........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)