How the gaze on the Jews was built, and the question it leaves

What can a Jew do, standing in an inheritance of twenty centuries of being defined from outside? I ask it as a practical question and I intend to answer it. But the answer requires understanding first why the outside gaze weighed so much and lasted so long. That weight was manufactured, and knowing how it was made changes what one can do with it.

A man was executed by Rome. Crucifixion was a Roman punishment for sedition, ordered by a Roman prefect, applied to someone proclaimed king in a restless province. The gospels were written decades later, after Rome had destroyed the Temple, by a community separating painfully from the Judaism it came from, while needing to survive inside the empire it hoped to win over. Blaming Rome for the death of its founder was suicidal; blaming the Jews served both needs at once.

Read in chronological order, the texts show the displacement in progress: the earliest keeps Pilate as the one who condemns; the later ones give us a hesitant, almost compassionate Pilate, a crowd that calls the blood down upon itself and its children, “the Jews” as a hostile block. No source outside those pages records any of it. What the record does show is the charge hardening into doctrine: the Jews had killed God. A crime against a man is judged and closed. A crime against God, in the logic that took hold, has no term and stains every generation.

That charge is the variable. The persecutions of the Christian world across two thousand years had many causes, and the record contains everything: legal humiliation, ghettos, expulsions from England, from France, from Spain, pogroms, blood libels, massacres. Dispersion without an army, visibility without power, economic functions both needed and despised, all of it fed the fire. None of it explains why the fire lasted twenty centuries. What deicide explains is the scale, the intensity, the demonization and the persistence: an accusation of infinite crime keeps hatred alive after every concrete cause has changed, because the culprit is guilty by existing.

Modernity drove the charge underground without killing it; when the nineteenth century translated theology into race, the guilt that conversion had once dissolved became biological, and a culpability that cannot be converted can only be eliminated. Deicide does not explain Nazism entire. Without deicide, the other causes of Nazism do not assemble into extermination. It is the piece the machine cannot run without.

Islam is the witness that proves it. Under Islam the Jew carried........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)