On June 11, 2026, President Trump announced that a “great settlement” with Iran was close to completion, that a memorandum of understanding could be signed within days in Europe, and that he believed Ayatollah Motjaba Khamenei had accepted the framework. Iran’s foreign ministry confirmed that a large part of the agreement was finalized, while adding that no final decision had been taken. The strikes the president had promised only hours earlier were called off. After more than three months of ultimatums followed by reversals, the threat of a decisive American blow had again been raised and again set aside.

Beneath that headline appeared a second statement that drew far less attention. Prime Minister Netanyahu said that Israel was not a party to the agreement. That sentence carries more weight than the deal itself.

A pattern of deadlines

For more than three months the United States has conducted this war through deadlines. An ultimatum is issued, a strike is threatened against Iranian infrastructure, and at or near the appointed hour the action is suspended in favor of further talks. The sequence has repeated often enough that markets and foreign ministries no longer react to it with alarm.

Washington can manage the conflict this way because the stakes it faces are economic and political. The price of oil, the stability of markets, the American position relative to Russia and China, and the value of an agreement signed under the president’s name can each be lost and then recovered. A deal that falls apart can be renegotiated, and a deadline that passes without action can be set again.

The stakes differ for each party

Iran’s position is serious, though it falls short of national survival. The Iranian........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)