Nine countries hold nuclear weapons. Eight of them can lose a city and still be a country the next morning. Russia could absorb a strike on Moscow and govern from a hundred other places across eleven time zones. The United States, China, and India all have room to bleed. They have distance, hinterland, a second and a third and a tenth place to stand. Israel has none of that. That single fact, the sheer smallness of its territory, makes its nuclear arsenal the most dangerous of the nine.

Look at a map with honest eyes. Israel runs about 470 kilometers from north to south, a drive of some five to six hours down its length. But length is not where the danger lives. At its waist, near Netanya, the country narrows to roughly 15 kilometers, a span a car crosses in minutes and a missile in seconds.

There is no depth to trade for time, no interior to retreat into, no province to sacrifice so the nation can regroup. Every point on that map sits close to a border. Every border touches a declared enemy, or has in living memory. When a state is this narrow, losing territorial control does not feel like a setback. It feels like the first minute of the end.

This is the psychological engine that other nuclear powers do not carry. Vast nations can tolerate the sensation of losing ground. Losing ground and losing the nation remain two distinct realities separated by hundreds of kilometers and tens of millions of people. In Israel, those two realities collapse into one.

The loss of control and the threat of annihilation arrive together, in the same instant, because there is no space between them. That is not paranoia. It is physical reality. When you can cross a country at its waist in minutes, you cannot afford to be wrong even once.

Smallness bites in a second way, and it lasts far longer than any battle. If a massive country suffers a radiological catastrophe, it can evacuate the poisoned region and resettle its people elsewhere. Israel has no elsewhere. Contamination, unlike an invasion, does not recede when the fighting stops.

A ground-level detonation or a strike on a nuclear installation pulls debris into the fireball and scatters far more long-lived fallout than an airburst high above a city ever would. Were the reactor at Dimona itself struck and its six decades of accumulated material released, the result, as I have argued previously, would not be measured in years but in geological time.

Independent modeling........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)