menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Destroy Everything Around Pickaxe Mountain. Then Invade.

30 0
latest

In my previous article, The Nuclear Option for Pickaxe Mountain, I concluded that a nuclear strike cannot solve the facility. The limitation extends beyond political fallout and public health consequences.

A nuclear detonation lethally contaminates the site, denying access to the interior long enough to render any ground verification impossible. It does not crush the deep chambers; it simply irradiates the access routes, leaving years of satellite inference about what the mountain actually holds completely unverified.

The reflexive counterargument always relies on Hiroshima. A city annihilated by a nuclear weapon now houses over a million residents, with ambient radiation indistinguishable from the natural global background. The assumption is that if a Japanese metropolis recovered, an Iranian mountain would follow. That comparison ignores physics.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were airbursts detonated hundreds of meters above the surface. The nuclear fireball never touched the earth, meaning minimal soil was drawn up, activated, and returned as fallout. Roughly eighty percent of the residual radiation dissipated within the first twenty-four hours, and the minimal fallout landed kilometers downwind, not at the hypocenter.

Bikini Atoll provides the accurate baseline. Surface detonations executed over seven decades ago left the islands permanently uninhabitable. Background gamma radiation on Bikini remains double the agreed safety limits, driven by isotopes that will not decay to safe thresholds until the next century.

An earth-penetrating weapon designed to burrow into granite before detonating represents the exact opposite of Hiroshima. It guarantees maximum ground coupling and maximum radiological activation. The resulting contamination is measured in centuries, not days. Invoking 1945 Japan to argue a nuclear strike leaves a temporary footprint relies on the wrong precedent. Evidence is not verified by irradiating the surface; it is verified by sending infantry to walk inside.

Since President Trump announced the United States will strike the mountain soon, the public debate has fixated on whether the facility can be destroyed from above. That is the wrong parameter. With the nuclear option discarded, the only metric that matters is the cost of breaching the complex from the ground.

Destroying Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La with conventional bunker-busters requires........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)