A Crisis Management and Change Leadership Perspective

When frozen or restricted Iranian assets are discussed in Western capitals, the conversation defaults to the technical: sanctions architecture, legal penalties, negotiation leverage, and regional compensation. But anyone with serious experience in change leadership knows that framing a crisis through the wrong lens is one of the most dangerous mistakes leaders can make. It shapes everything that follows: the decisions, the priorities, the stakeholders you include, and ultimately the outcomes you produce.

Frozen assets are the Iranian people’s money.

Diagnosing the Crisis Before Prescribing the Solution

In crisis management, one of the cardinal rules is to resist the pressure to jump to solutions before you have accurately diagnosed the problem. Poorly diagnosed crises produce solutions that address symptoms while the underlying issue deepens.

The Western narrative treats the Iranian crisis as a regional security problem: a rogue regime, destabilizing proxies, nuclear ambitions. That diagnosis leads to a predictable set of tools: sanctions and then deals. Those tools have been applied for over four decades. They have not resolved the crisis.

A proper crisis diagnosis must ask: What is the root cause? And who is the primary victim? The answers change the approach entirely. The primary victims of this crisis are the Iranian people, and the root cause of all issues in the region is the regime’s existence.

The Change Leadership Dimension: Who Owns the Transition?

In change leadership, one of the most consequential questions is: who owns the change, and who must live with its results?

When a transition is designed around those who hold power, rather than those who must live through and after the change, it fails. Real........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)