The treatment of Henry Nowak’s killer was all about race
‘How can you say they’re not racist?’ a young Asian woman shouted from the public gallery. Vickrum Digwa had just been led down to the cells to serve a life sentence and an elderly man in a turban was calling his lawyer ‘a fucking bean head’. The tatty pinewood interior of Southampton Crown Court was descending, once again, into allegations of racism.
Vickrum Digwa will serve at least 21 years in prison for the murder of Henry Nowak. Last December, Digwa repeatedly stabbed the 18-year-old student with a ceremonial Sikh dagger. He then filmed Henry as he bled out, goading him.
When police arrived, Digwa claimed that Henry had been racially abusive and had knocked his turban off. The police believed him, ignoring Henry’s pleas that he was wounded even as he lay on ground, blood streaming from his head. Extraordinarily, police chose to put Henry in handcuffs. The boy kept saying ‘I can’t breathe’. Only once he lost consciousness did police remove the handcuffs and administer CPR.
No one really knows why the altercation happened. Whatever the cause, judge William Mousley KC said that Henry had acted no more than ‘cheekily’ with Digwa in the moments before he was stabbed. ‘I am sure that Henry had said nothing racist,’ the judge concluded. The judge also noted that it is illegal for anyone but a Sikh to carry such a weapon. It’s something we allow in Britain, in the name of tolerance.
On the steps of the court, Mark Nowak read a statement to the news cameras in which he said his son ‘should not have died on the streets of Southampton in police custody. The way he was treated was inhumane and degrading.’ In his victim impact statement, Mark said he was ‘tormented by thoughts of how Henry was feeling lying there bleeding in the road’.
The question of Henry’s........
