Don Rittner’s column: Saratoga vs. Capital District
Historic preservation looks very different in Saratoga Springs than it does in the rest of the Capital District. Both places have deep architectural roots going back to the 1700s and 1800s, but the way they handle new construction tells two separate stories. Saratoga Springs has built a strong system, both regulatory and cultural, that insists new buildings actually fit alongside the old. Meanwhile, cities like Albany, Troy, and Schenectady often let development reshape or even break apart the character of their historic neighborhoods.
Saratoga Springs owes much of its success to a detailed, enforced design review process. Since the late 20th century, you can’t touch a building’s exterior within a historic district, whether it’s fixing, tearing down, or building something totally new, without the city’s Design Review Commission signing off. They look at everything: size, materials, rhythm, and more. They’re not trying to turn the city into a museum, but they do want any change to make sense next to what’s already there.
What’s interesting is that Saratoga’s rules welcome modern buildings, as long as they’re done thoughtfully. The city doesn’t want cookie-cutter imitations or awkward modern invasions. Instead, they........
