menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Can We Accept Societal Change?

60 0
19.03.2026

Across South Asia, a silent social transformation is underway. Increasingly, women are choosing to live independently, delaying marriage or opting to remain single. In India, recent demographic trends have shown a noticeable rise in the number of women living alone and managing their lives independently. Pakistan, often perceived as more socially conservative, is not far behind in witnessing this shift.

A key driver behind this change is the steady improvement in women’s literacy and educational attainment. Over the past two decades, more women have entered universities, professional institutions, and training programs. Education has expanded not only their economic prospects but also their horizons and aspirations. Alongside this, women’s participation in the workforce particularly in sectors such as education, healthcare, media, and corporate services has gradually increased.

As a result, many women are moving to urban centres and metropolitan cities in pursuit of employment, financial stability, and personal independence. Cities like Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad increasingly host women who live alone or share accommodation with other women while pursuing their careers. For many, this is not merely a logistical arrangement but an expression of autonomy and self-determination.

This phenomenon should be embraced as a sign of social progress. However, it also exposes the structural and cultural challenges single women continue to face.

One of the most persistent problems is finding safe and accessible housing. The rental market in Pakistan remains overwhelmingly male-dominated, both in terms of property ownership and decision-making. Single women often report being denied accommodation simply because landlords assume that a woman living alone is inappropriate, risky, or socially questionable. In some cases, landlords insist on family members acting as guarantors or impose intrusive conditions that male tenants rarely encounter.

Workplaces present another set of complex challenges. Despite the growing presence of women in professional environments, single women are often treated as anomalies. Their personal choices become a subject of curiosity or judgment, with colleagues frequently asking intrusive questions about their marital status or speculating about the reasons behind their decision to remain unmarried.

Professional advancement can also become more difficult for single women. In some environments, their competence and independence may be perceived as a challenge to traditional workplace hierarchies. Accomplished and confident women sometimes encounter subtle resistance from male colleagues who may feel uncomfortable with their growing professional authority. This can manifest in delayed promotions, limited opportunities for leadership roles, or exclusion from important professional networks.

At the same time, many single women consciously maintain professional boundaries with male colleagues in order to safeguard their reputation in a society where women’s character is often judged more harshly. They may choose not to participate in informal gatherings or after-work social events where professional relationships are frequently strengthened. While this decision protects their dignity and personal comfort, it can also unintentionally limit their access to informal networks that influence career advancement.

In certain cases, workplace power dynamics can become another obstacle. Performance evaluations, reporting structures, and managerial discretion can sometimes be used in ways that discourage women from asserting themselves or pursuing higher professional positions. The possibility of critical performance reports or formal warnings can create pressure that discourages women from challenging unfair treatment or seeking greater opportunities for advancement.

Underlying these challenges is the persistent social belief that marriage is the inevitable and ideal path for every woman. While marriage remains a valued institution, it is increasingly clear that life trajectories are becoming more diverse. Divorce, too, is a reality that societies must learn to approach with empathy rather than stigma.

Remaining single whether by choice, circumstance, or after divorce should not invite suspicion or moral judgment. When society insists on interrogating women about their personal decisions, it not only invades their privacy but also reinforces harmful stereotypes.

Pakistan stands at an important crossroads. As women’s education and workforce participation continue to rise, more women will seek independence in their personal and professional lives. Rather than resisting this change, institutions and communities must adapt to it.

Encouragingly, some policy developments indicate a gradual recognition of women’s independent identity. Allowing women to retain their father’s name on their identity cards is a positive step in this direction. Symbolically, it acknowledges that a woman’s identity should not be defined solely through marriage.

However, the problems and barriers single women face remain complex and deeply rooted in social attitudes and institutional practices. For meaningful progress, institutions and workplaces must move beyond symbolic measures and ensure inclusive practices. Women’s rights to safety, their power to raise their voices against unfair treatment, equal opportunities for career progression, and their right to live independently must be protected and respected.

Accepting the single woman not as an exception but as a legitimate and respected member of society is not merely a matter of individual rights — it is a reflection of a society that values dignity, equality, and personal freedom.

Sadia Shaukat and Nadia SiddiquiSadia Shaukat is Associate professor, University of Education, Pakistan. Nadia Siddiqui Professor of Durham University, UK.


© The Nation