menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

The dangers of Trump’s National Defense Strategy

11 0
17.02.2026

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

News Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

Policy Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

Business Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

Opinion Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

Events Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Live updates: DHS funding

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Content from Google Cloud

Hillary Clinton: Trump administration perpetuating Epstein files ‘cover up’ Administration | 8 minutes ago

Harris mourns Jackson: ‘One of America’s greatest patriots’ In The Know | 13 minutes ago

Opinion George W. Bush and Barack Obama are missing in action Opinions - White House | 17 minutes ago

LA Mayor Bass says 2028 Olympics head Wasserman should step down over Epstein ties State Watch | 19 minutes ago

Ocasio-Cortez says she went to Munich ‘not because I’m running for president’ House | 26 minutes ago

O’Reilly: Trump allowing critics to define his legacy Administration | 34 minutes ago

Texas attorney general investigating student immigration protests Education | 45 minutes ago

Opinion The dangers of Trump’s National Defense Strategy Opinions - International | 47 minutes ago

The dangers of Trump’s National Defense Strategy

Last month, the Defense Department published its long-awaited National Defense Strategy, a practical guide published every four years to implement its broader National Security Strategy. This pair of documents from the Trump administration deliberately sets out to chart a new path, distinct from the more conventional approaches laid out by previous administrations.

President Trump’s National Defense Strategy and National Security Strategy distinguish themselves rhetorically by adopting a tone that is more muscular, yet is much more restrained in its involvement in international affairs. Two fundamental questions arise from the policy models Trump is presenting before the world: How different are they from the way earlier administrations addressed national security concerns, and do they improve or retard the pursuit of America’s long-range national interests?  

The Defense Strategy notes, “President Trump took office in January 2025 to one of the most dangerous security environments in our nation’s history. … Meanwhile in Europe, where Trump had previously led [NATO] allies to begin taking their defenses seriously, the last administration effectively encouraged them to free-ride, leaving the Alliance unable to deter or respond effectively to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”  

This statement implies that Trump views Russia’s aggression against Ukraine as an important matter of national concern. Yet, while he frequently claimed during his campaign that he would end the war in 24 hours, he has spent much of the first year of his return to office striving to reconcile the irreconcilable positions of Moscow and Kiev. Shockingly to students of American history and tradition, he has openly sided with Russia’s position demanding major concessions of Ukrainian territory and sovereignty.  

At the same time, to his credit, Trump has succeeded in narrowing the gap in contributions to the defense of Ukraine by the U.S. and the rest of NATO; he has pressed the Europeans to increase their defense spending and to purchase U.S. weapons for transfer to Ukraine. But, to Vladimir Putin’s relief and Volodymyr Zelinsky’s frustration, he has withheld the uniquely American long-range weapons Ukraine needs to strike critical strategic targets deep inside Russia. He also opposes facilitating the transfer of billions of dollars in frozen Russian assets for Ukraine’s wartime use and postwar reconstruction.  

The National Defense Strategy also faults Trump’s predecessor for having “allowed, even enabled, our cunning adversaries to grow more powerful, even as they … increased risk of America itself being drawn into simultaneous major wars across theaters—a third world war, as President Trump himself warned.” But despite that concern, Trump seems not to include Russia among the traditional quartet of “cunning adversaries,” along with China, Iran and North Korea, bent on drawing the U.S. into a two-front or three-front war.

History’s lessons teach that such a drastic scenario is far more likely with an appeased but still unsatisfied Russia moving from a partially defeated and weakened Ukraine to the Baltics or Poland. It is not peace through strength.

The most likely co-conspirator for Russia in its potential multi-front conflict with the U.S. is China, Russia’s declared “no limits strategic partner” since at least February 2022, when their burgeoning collaboration launched the second major Russian invasion of Ukraine. 

The Defense Strategy noted that in recent years, “China and its military grew more powerful in the Indo-Pacific region, the world’s largest and most dynamic market area, with significant implications for Americans’ own security, freedom, and prosperity.” The document stated U.S. purpose clearly: “To prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies … we will erect a strong denial defense along the First Island Chain.” The critical linchpin in that chain is Taiwan.

The Defense Strategy claims, “The president’s approach is one of a flexible, practical realism that looks at the world in a clear-eyed way.” But that self-praise ignores how Beijing views the lack of U.S will in Ukraine to defend a strategic and democratic partner against a relentless aggressor that offers economic advantages and personal leadership blandishments. It is doubtless manipulating geopolitical circumstances to discourage or strategically delay U.S. intervention in a Taiwan contingency.   

The National Defense Strategy argues that U.S. deterrence against China, such as it is, is not intended to “strangle” China, and is therefore innocuous in U.S.-China relations. But the fundamental question is, what does the U.S. do if China’s intention is to strangle Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan and the U.S. itself?  

History will brand the U.S. failure to ensure Ukraine’s victory and prevent Taiwan’s fall as the time when America fell from greatness and her “cunning” but miscalculating enemies plunged the world into a new global conflict.

Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He is a nonresident fellow at the Institute for Corean-American Studies, a member of the advisory board of the Global Taiwan Institute and member of the advisory board of the Vandenberg Coalition.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Opinions - International News

DHS shutdown has no clear off-ramp: 5 takeaways

Senate Democrats send counteroffer to White House amid DHS shutdown

Ocasio-Cortez’s Munich appearance draws mixed response from Democrats

Colbert rips CBS, saying lawyers barred interview with lawmaker

What to know about the disastrous Potomac sewage spill

Why violent crime is dropping in US cities

More and more ham sandwiches aren’t getting indicted nowadays

Homan says he doesn’t ‘know’ meaning behind Noem’s ‘right ...

Noem dismisses criticism of ‘right people’ voting for ‘right ...

Ocasio-Cortez says she went to Munich ‘not because I’m running for ...

Trump pays tribute to ‘force of nature’ Jesse Jackson

Republicans worry party won’t do enough to address costs before midterms

Trump wants America to vote on his terms, or not at all

Axelrod: Trump offered new ballroom during Obama era

Pentagon reviewing Anthropic partnership over terms of use dispute

Judge invokes George Orwell’s ‘1984’ in ordering restoration ...

Trump slams Newsom over ‘inappropriate’ California-UK energy agreement

Trump directs federal authorities to protect Potomac

The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?


© The Hill