1 Trending: Here Are The 8 Most Insane Things In The ‘DIGNIDAD’ Amnesty Bill

2 Trending: Only Prosecutions Can End Dems’ DOJ Weaponization, But Media Pretend That’s Not Obvious

3 Trending: Republicans Debate The Way Democrats Want Them To

4 Trending: In His Own Words: Trump Has Been Saying Iran Can’t Have Nukes For 20 Years

WaPo Thinks SCOTUS Upholding The Constitution Is A Bad Thing

In his new article, Washington Post reporter Justin Jouvenal attempts to convince readers that SCOTUS has waged a war on ‘civil rights.’

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The unspoken competition among legacy media outlets to see who can produce the most asinine propaganda is pretty fierce this week. On top of a debunked hatchet job involving the Pentagon and Vatican, The Washington Post decided to throw its hat in the ring with a particularly dumb hit piece of its own — this time, against the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a Thursday article titled, “Supreme Court remade by Trump ushers in historic defeats for civil rights,” Post reporter Justin Jouvenal attempted to convince readers that the court’s conservative justices have waged an all-out war on “civil rights” in “cases involving women and minorities.” Naturally, he attributed this to “President Donald Trump’s three appointees” — Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett — who he said have “remade” the court to be “sharply conservative.”

“The court has also entered a new era of extreme partisanship. None over the past seven decades has been as starkly polarized,” Jouvenal wrote in melodramatic fashion.

The entire premise of the piece is based on an “analysis” by Washington University and Penn State professors, who, after reportedly examining 270 of the court’s decisions from 2020-2024 and a Supreme Court database they maintain themselves,........

© The Federalist