1 Trending: Senate GOP Should Know Better Than To Ignore Trump’s Political Instincts On The SAVE Act

2 Trending: Democrats Revive FDR Court-Packing Scheme To Rig The Supreme Court

3 Trending: Hundreds Rally To Preserve Daughters Of The American Revolution For Actual Women

4 Trending: Can George Washington’s Home Be Saved From Rogue Judges By July 4?

Thomas, Alito Chide Rogue Judges For Ignoring SCOTUS And The Law

‘I am skeptical that the relief that the District Court ordered complies’ with existing law, wrote Justice Thomas.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The phenomenon of rogue judges ignoring the Constitution and the Supreme Court in favor of partisan outcomes is growing every day. And it looks like Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have taken notice.

Across a pair of decisions issued Thursday (both authored by Alito), the two senior justices separately rebuked several lower courts for sidestepping immigration law and the high court’s past rulings. The cases were Mullin v. Doe and Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, in which the court upheld President Trump’s revocation of Temporary Protected Status for foreign nationals and affirmed that asylum seekers do not “arriv[e] in the United States” when they’re standing on the Mexican side of the border, respectively.

In his Al Otro Lado concurrence, Thomas noted how the federal immigration law at issue (“Immigration and Nationality Act”) bars federal courts from having jurisdiction over and the authority to “‘enjoin or restrain the operation of ‘ certain parts of the INA.” Citing a past related SCOTUS ruling (Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez), he further highlighted how the law’s exception “only for relief granted on an individual basis”........

© The Federalist