Supreme Court Upholds Laws Protecting Women’s Sports From ‘Trans’ Radicalism
1 Trending: Gorsuch Skewers SCOTUS For Ducking Covid Shot Mandate Case
2 Trending: California Races To Neuter An Office That A Conservative Might Win
3 Trending: New Study: Immigration Caused 40% Of Your Rent Hikes Over 10 Years
4 Trending: Daughters Of The American Revolution Betrays Its Mission By Rejecting Resolution To Keep Its Ranks Female
Supreme Court Upholds Laws Protecting Women’s Sports From ‘Trans’ Radicalism
‘Consistent with Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause, we hold that the States may maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females,’ wrote Justice Kavanaugh.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws protecting women’s sports from trans-identifying men on Tuesday. The ruling was 6-3 in the reasoning along ideological lines.
The decision stems from Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., which dealt with challenges brought against Idaho and West Virginia’s laws ensuring fairness for female athletes. As The Federalist previously reported, legal specialists, female athletes, and Republican attorneys general “have all highlighted how males’ distinct biological advantage over women puts them at a competitive advantage over female athletes and imposes physical risks to their safety.”
Writing for the majority in B.P.J., Justice Brett Kavanaugh ruled that state laws permitting schools to “determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex” do not violate the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause or Title IX. He emphasized that “[s]eparate sports teams for biological males and biological females are reasonable: Given the inherent........
