1 Trending: Jack Smith’s Twisting Of Justice Makes The Case For Anti-Weaponization Fund

2 Trending: Poll: 4 In 10 Young Americans Support Sharia Law

3 Trending: Even Jane Doe’s Own Story About The Cornell 7 Is A Bad Look For Her

4 Trending: In So Ordered, Justice Alito Challenges Americans To Be Courageous Citizens

New Report On Biden Targeting Parents Shows What Dems Will Do As Soon As They Gain Power

A Democrat-controlled Congress would give the same party subpoena power, committee leadership roles, and resources to do what it’s done in the past: investigate and harass its opponents.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Sunday marked five years since then-Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memorandum that instructed his Department of Justice (DOJ) to help investigate and prosecute parents who showed up at school board meetings to complain about far-left initiatives or Covid policies. Five years later we now know that the Biden White House was behind Garland’s effort to target parents, The Federalist’s Matt Kittle reported.

The anniversary and new finding also come on the heels of former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s testimony before Congress last week, in which his lawfare efforts to keep President Donald Trump out of office faced further scrutiny. With the midterms less than a month away, both instances serve to remind Americans of what Democrats will do with power given the chance: wage a lawfare campaign against their political opponents.

Parents Became Public Enemy No. 1

Back in September of 2021, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to the Biden administration asking it to take on the “immediate threat” that parents posed to their children’s schools. The “threat” stemmed from parents who were voicing their concerns and criticisms about critical race theory curriculum, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates. The NSBA wanted the Biden administration to treat the parents speaking out as “equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism.” Notably, the NSBA later apologized and acknowledged “there was no justification for some of the language included in the........

© The Federalist