The Pulse | Diplomacy | South Asia

How the US-Iran War Has Upended Pakistan’s Diplomacy

Saudi Arabia, wary of further escalation, is unlikely to press Pakistan to deploy troops or join the conflict at this stage.

Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar addresses a press briefing at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Islamabad, Pakistan, Mar. 3, 2026.

The U.S. and Israel launched a major military campaign against Iran on Friday in an apparent effort to disarm the country. Washington’s attacks on Iran, which have been widely criticized as illegal and unlawful, are still not only underway but have become more extensive with each passing day.

The war has already inflicted widespread damage in Iran and disrupted oil flows in the Gulf. Iran, for its own part, has retaliated with unexpected ferocity, launching barrages of missiles and drones at U.S. interests and military bases scattered across Gulf nations. This has clearly expanded the conflict with no clear end in sight.

This development has come as a profound shock to Pakistan, particularly because it unfolded amid ongoing nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran and appears to have derailed what seemed like a path toward de-escalation between the two countries and the wider region.

What has further stunned the Pakistani leadership and its people is the targeted killing of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with members of his family, in the initial airstrikes that ignited the war. This is a development that Islamabad, like many other nations, views as a reckless escalation which is only certain to bring instability.

Pakistan’s perspective on this unfolding crisis is one of deep unease. For instance, the development threatens to unravel the country’s carefully nurtured relationship with the United States. For months, Pakistani diplomats had been quietly working to avert just such a confrontation as they tried to position Islamabad as a potential mediator in the volatile standoff.

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, in a candid briefing to parliament on Tuesday, revealed the extent of these efforts and underscored a sense of disappointment.

“Iran had agreed not to acquire nuclear weapons,” Dar told lawmakers, as he recounted a crucial meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio where he disclosed Tehran’s concessions. “But the U.S. wanted Iran’s entire nuclear program to be completely dismantled.”

He also emphasized that Pakistan stood ready to host mediation talks in Islamabad and that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief of Army Staff Gen. Asim Munir played “a very active and positive role in diplomatic and defense-level engagements.”

Arguably, this disclosure wasn’t just a recounting of facts, but a sharp indication of Islamabad’s disappointment with Washington’s actions. Moreover, this was a signal to domestic stakeholders and regional allies that Pakistan had exhausted every avenue to prevent the war.

In Islamabad, there’s a palpable frustration that these good-faith initiatives of Pakistan and other countries were brushed aside by Washington, leaving the country and the region to grapple with the fallout of a conflict they desperately sought to avoid.

Moreover, the broader ramifications seem to be that Pakistan’s growing ties with the U.S. have suddenly become a potential liability. During President Donald Trump’s second term, Pakistan has gone to great lengths to build rapport with Washington by at times lavishing praise on the president for his supposed aversion to endless wars, even floating his name for the Nobel Peace Prize.

But in the wake of Washington’s hasty and rash decision to launch strikes on Iran, those overtures now appear misguided and unwise. It is important to note that public sentiment in Pakistan, which has historically been skeptical of American foreign policy adventurism, has soured further. This development is likely to force the country’s leaders to navigate a diplomatic minefield where overt alignment with the U.S. risks alienating a populace that is now increasingly sympathetic to Iran’s plight and sees Washington as deceitful and unreliable.

Moreover, compounding these challenges is Pakistan’s involvement in the so-called Board of Peace, which was established and led by President Trump to address the Palestinian issue. Arguably, Islamabad’s decision to join this forum was seen as a bold step toward asserting a more proactive role in Middle Eastern affairs. However, the outbreak of the Iran war has only made the platform more controversial. With hostilities between the U.S. and Iran raging, domestic calls in Pakistan are mounting to withdraw from the Board as people now increasingly view participation as untenable amid the unjustifiable attacks on Iran, which has resulted in the death of at least 1,000 people already.

Other pressures are mounting on Islamabad as well. While Pakistan is clearly disappointed over the U.S. decision to back Israel’s offensive against Iran, there’s........

© The Diplomat