Lawyers for Texas Anti-ICE Agitators Try to Discredit Anti-Antifa Witness by Citing Group That Carries Water for Antifa

George Washington’s Warning About Religion Still Matters

Dear Nonprofit Leaders: Values Alignment Matters in Finance Too

‘Largest Deportation in History’? Why the GOP Is Divided Over This Immigration Question

What to Know About Judge Who Blocked Trump Immigration Court Reform

Poll Reveals Popularity of Trump’s Iran Performance

  PoliticsSecurityNews

Weaponized Immigration Methods Aimed at America

Why Chinese Communist Media Is Touting the US Constitution

China Receiving ‘Mixed Signals’ on US Operation in Iran

Not Just the Ayatollah—How Operation Epic Fury Is Remaking Geopolitics

 EducationPoliticsNews

EXCLUSIVE: Bill to Dismantle Taxpayer-Funded Democrat ‘Talent Pipeline’ Expected to Pass House Committee

Dire Straits for Midterms? Gas Price Surge Troubles Senators

Democrats Block DHS Reopening as TSA Lines Grow Longer

 PoliticsSecurityNews

Florida Passes Voter ID Bill as National SAVE Act Stalls

What’s on Voters’ Minds? Polls Suggest These 3 Issues

Senate Passes Bipartisan Housing Package as SAVE Act Pressure Builds

Why the Real Fight Over Virginia’s Partisan Map to Reshape Congress May Come After Referendum

DOJ Review of Voter Rolls Uncovers Alarming Names—and It’s Only the Beginning

Hegseth: Iran’s Leader ‘Wounded and Likely Disfigured’

Does Iran Still Have a War Strategy?

Iran Indicates Khamenei’s Hardline Son Will Be Next Supreme Leader

Lawmakers Look to Ensure Military Is Prepared for Long-Term Threats

Beyond the Oyster Fork: An Etiquette Expert’s Tips for ‘Relationships, Work, and Life’

Is the Iran Operation ‘America First’?

 International Commentary

Russia Operating ‘Systematic Child Abduction Operation,’ EU Ambassador Says

Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond 

While Some Allies Hesitate, Israel Is Already in the Fight Against Iran

Victor Davis Hanson: Why Kristi Noem Failed at DHS

Victor Davis Hanson: Newsom’s Rocky Month Shows the Risks of Running on Style Over Substance

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump Laid Out America’s Comeback While Democrats Sat Silent

Lawyers for Texas Anti-ICE Agitators Try to Discredit Anti-Antifa Witness by Citing Group That Carries Water for Antifa

Members of Antifa hold shields on Dec. 12, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Tyler O'Neil / @Tyler2ONeil

Tyler O'Neil is senior editor at The Daily Signal and the author of two books: "Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center," and "The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government."

Lawyers representing alleged Antifa members who set off fireworks outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Texas and who later shot a police officer tried to discredit an anti-Antifa witness by citing a group that carries water for Antifa. 

Federal prosecutors have charged nine defendants with various crimes for their July 4, 2025, riot outside the Prairieland ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas. A federal grand jury convicted eight of them on the charge of riot and providing material support to terrorists on Friday. While most charges did not rely on the claim that rioters were part of Antifa, the indictment describes the defendants as an “Antifa Cell.”

During the trial, prosecutors brought in Kyle Shideler, director and senior analyst for homeland security and counterterrorism at the Center for Security Policy, as an expert witness on Antifa. Defense lawyers objected, citing the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left activist group that has carried water for Antifa, to delegitimize his testimony.

Patrick McLain, the defense attorney representing Zachary Evetts, confirmed to The Daily Signal that he objected to Shideler’s testimony, and he referenced a lengthy report written by Anne Speckhard, a retired adjunct associate professor of psychiatry at Georgetown University Medical Center.

“I objected, on behalf of my client, to Mr. Shideler rendering opinions on matters at issue which only a court-recognized expert could do,” McLain told The Daily Signal. “The court overruled most of my objections,” he admitted. (Per his request, the entirety of McLain’s comment to The Daily Signal appears at the bottom of this article.)

He referenced Speckhard’s report, which, among other things, notes the SPLC’s accusation that the Center for Security Policy is an “anti-Muslim hate group,” and claims the organization “engaged in fear-based advocacy, not objective science.”

Defense attorneys also cited the SPLC while objecting during the trial.

“An attorney for another defendant, in his cross-examination of Mr. Shideler, brought up that Mr. Shideler’s employer, the Center for Security Policy, had been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center,” McLain added. “That evidence came in without objection.”

Shideler contested the accusation in court, however.

“Yes sir, the Southern Poverty Law Center has mislabeled many people as a hate group,” Shideler said in response to a question from defense lawyer Phillip Hayes, The Intercept reported.

SPLC’s Ties to Antifa

The SPLC, a public interest law firm that gained its reputation by suing Ku Klux Klan chapters into bankruptcy, and now condemns mainstream conservative and Christian groups by putting them on a “hate map” with Klan chapters, has refused to put Antifa on the map. It calls the Center for Security Policy a “hate group” because it warns against the threat of radical Islam.

A terrorist confessed to using the map to target the conservative Christian Family Research Council in 2012.

While the SPLC’s former president, Richard Cohen, condemned Antifa violence once in 2017, the SPLC has not condemned Antifa since.

In June 2020, the SPLC attacked President Trump for announcing his intention to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization. It warned that “those who identify with” the Antifa label “represent a large spectrum of the political left” and that “far-right extremists use similar tactics” to the Trump administration in condemning Antifa.

Although Antifa agitators took part in the Black Lives Matter riots between May 28 and June 8, 2020, which resulted in more than $2 billion in insurance payouts and cost the lives of at least 26 Americans, the SPLC minimized Antifa violence as “skirmishes and property crimes,” adding that “the threat of lethal violence pales in comparison to that posed by far-right extremists.”

Megan Squire, whom Wired profiled as “antifa’s secret weapon against far-right extremists” in 2018, reportedly worked closely with the SPLC, feeding the organization data on white nationalist and other groups. She said she does not consider herself antifa but is “sympathetic to antifa’s goal of silencing racist extremists.” She passed along information “to those who might put it to real-world use. Who might weaponize it.”

Squire joined the SPLC full-time in 2022 before leaving the organization in March 2025, according to her verified LinkedIn profile.

Neither the SPLC nor Squire responded to requests for comment.

Other Criticisms of Shideler

In addition to the SPLC attack, Speckhard raised other concerns about Shideler. She claimed that he lacks “academic training for expertise in “social-movement analysis.” She claimed his analysis of Antifa materials did not use “any coding schema, sampling framework, data verification protocol, or analytical model.” She faulted him for “ideological bias.”

Speckhard cited previous government reports claiming that “Antifa is a way of thinking, perhaps a philosophically aligned social movement to resist fascism in all its forms, but no national Antifa organization exists.”

The judge ultimately allowed Shideler’s testimony.

Both Shideler and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas declined to comment for this story.

The Defense Attorney’s Statement

McLain’s full statement appears below.

I am one of the attorneys for Zachary Evetts, one of nine defendants in Northern District of Texas Case No. 4:25-cr-00259-P USA v. Arnold et al.  They are charged with federal crimes regarding their conduct surrounding a noise demonstration at an ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas on 4 July 2025.  The federal prosecutors called Mr. Kyle Shideler, an employee of the Center for Security Policy, to testify about something he called Antifa. Though the prosecutor had filed notice that they intended to offer Mr. Shideler as an expert at trial, in an unspecified topic, the prosecutor never made the requisite request, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, to have the Court to recognize Mr. Shideler as an expert in any area, and the Court never recognized Mr. Shideler as an expert.  Thus, I objected, on behalf of my client, to Mr. Shideler rendering opinions on matters at issue which only a court-recognized expert could do.  The Court overruled most of my objections.   An attorney for another defendant, in his cross-examination of Mr. Shideler, brought up that Mr. Shideler’s employer, the Center for Security Policy, had been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.  That evidence came in without objection.  There was much testimony elicited from Mr. Shideler that challenged his qualifications and his assertion that there is an organization called Antifa which he called a terrorist organization. Of note, the US government and many other contemporary Western governments have investigated the question of whether there is an organization called Antifa and, if so, whether it meets the definition of a terrorist organization.  Until President Trump elected, on his own in September 2025, to issue an Executive order stating that there is a terrorist organization called Antifa, neither the US government or any other government had made such a pronouncement.  For a better discussion of this issue, I commend to you Georgetown University professor emeritus Dr. Anne Speckhard who, as a forensic psychologist, has interviewed over 800 domestic and international terrorists for our government and other governments and has much helpful to say about Antifa.

I am one of the attorneys for Zachary Evetts, one of nine defendants in Northern District of Texas Case No. 4:25-cr-00259-P USA v. Arnold et al.  They are charged with federal crimes regarding their conduct surrounding a noise demonstration at an ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas on 4 July 2025.  The federal prosecutors called Mr. Kyle Shideler, an employee of the Center for Security Policy, to testify about something he called Antifa.

Though the prosecutor had filed notice that they intended to offer Mr. Shideler as an expert at trial, in an unspecified topic, the prosecutor never made the requisite request, under the Federal Rules of Evidence, to have the Court to recognize Mr. Shideler as an expert in any area, and the Court never recognized Mr. Shideler as an expert.  Thus, I objected, on behalf of my client, to Mr. Shideler rendering opinions on matters at issue which only a court-recognized expert could do.  The Court overruled most of my objections.  

An attorney for another defendant, in his cross-examination of Mr. Shideler, brought up that Mr. Shideler’s employer, the Center for Security Policy, had been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.  That evidence came in without objection.  There was much testimony elicited from Mr. Shideler that challenged his qualifications and his assertion that there is an organization called Antifa which he called a terrorist organization.

Of note, the US government and many other contemporary Western governments have investigated the question of whether there is an organization called Antifa and, if so, whether it meets the definition of a terrorist organization.  Until President Trump elected, on his own in September 2025, to issue an Executive order stating that there is a terrorist organization called Antifa, neither the US government or any other government had made such a pronouncement.  For a better discussion of this issue, I commend to you Georgetown University professor emeritus Dr. Anne Speckhard who, as a forensic psychologist, has interviewed over 800 domestic and international terrorists for our government and other governments and has much helpful to say about Antifa.

City Agency Promotes ‘Art of Civil Disobedience’ Class Hosted by Socialists, Anti-Trump Activists

The Minnesota Incident: A Case Study in Media Narrative Versus Reality 

Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond 

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  

© The Daily Signal