$1 Billion on the Line as Supreme Court Could Rewrite US–Cuba Lawsuits
$1 Billion on the Line as Supreme Court Could Rewrite US–Cuba Lawsuits
‘They Never Say Thank You’: Mamdani and California Want to Take More and More From Rich
Health CareCommentary
Trump’s Health Revolution Is Moving Faster Than Washington Expected
The Elephants in the Room at Trump’s SOTU
Laken Riley’s Mother Gives Emotional Message to Trump
Trump Administration Keeps Vast Number of Guns From Mexican Cartels
Why Are Anti-ICE Activists Building Borders?
EXCLUSIVE: Heritage Says States Should Charge Tuition to Illegal Alien Children
InternationalCommentary
Cracking Down on China’s Trade Cheating the Right Way
Time for Denmark and the United States to Secure Greenland
Daughter Pleads for Father’s Release From Chinese Prison
What to Expect in PLA Activities Near Taiwan Leading Up to Trump and Xi Summit
The Elephants in the Room at Trump’s SOTU
The Strangest Bets Markets Are Offering on Trump’s SOTU
Noem Uses Unique Tool to Pressure Democrats on DHS Funding Deal
Conservatives Look to Protect Truckers From ‘Unqualified’ Illegal Immigrant Drivers
More States Moving to Close Election Funding Loophole Few Voters Knew Existed
ACLU Looks to Dismantle Ohio Election Integrity Law
Largest ‘Precinct’: Why Some Mail Ballots Travel Across State Lines Before Counting Begins
Schumer Vows to Fight Supposed ‘Jim Crow 2.0’ Bill With Policy 83% of Americans Support
‘War Was Visited Upon These People’: Play About Oct. 7 Comes to DC
Are Americans Being Radicalized Online and Converting to Islam?
International Analysis
Why Is the Iran Regime on the Verge of Collapse?
Trump Envoy Announces Next Phase of Gaza Peace Plan
Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond
OH BABY! Couples Could Make Big Money on Trump Accounts
What Comes Next for Venezuela? State Department Official Explains
ICE Operations: What Americans Actually Want
‘They Never Say Thank You’: Mamdani and California Want to Take More and More From Rich
Glib Barista AOC’s Ignorance Front and Center at Munich Security Conference
The New Democratic Socialist Party Is a ‘Graveyard of Bad Ideas’
International Commentary
Victor Davis Hanson: Rubio Tells Europe What It Needs to Hear
$1 Billion on the Line as Supreme Court Could Rewrite US–Cuba Lawsuits
Supreme Court Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch (R) and Brett Kavanaugh (L). (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)
Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH
Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Send an email to Fred.
Justices heard arguments Monday in two disputes involving U.S.-Cuba relations that could be worth more than $1 billion.
Oil giant ExxonMobil is a plaintiff in one of the cases, while major cruise lines, led by Royal Caribbean, are defendants in the other. A majority of justices seemed poised to side with ExxonMobil, while both conservative and liberal justices seemed skeptical about the claim against the cruise companies.
The cases are based on the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996, also known as the Helms-Burton Act, which formalized the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba. Title III of the law allows for lawsuits in U.S. courts against entities that traffic in property confiscated by the Cuban government after the communist revolution of 1959.
However, only recently did a president allow for lawsuits to proceed under the law. President Donald Trump lifted the suspension of lawsuits in 2019 that led to about 40 complaints.
Presidents Bill Clinton, who signed the law, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama all suspended Title III, seeking to avoid diplomatic conflicts with U.S. allies such as Canada and Spain that are heavily invested in Cuba. Obama also expanded relations with Cuba during his second term.
This is the first time the high court has ruled on the 30-year-old law.
ExxonMobil is seeking more than $1 billion in compensation for oil and gas assets seized by a Cuban state-owned company CIMEX. It filed the lawsuit in federal court in 2019 in the District of Columbia, CNBC reported.
ExxonMobil wants the high court to reverse a 2024 lower court ruling that this was a foreign sovereign immunity matter, meaning a foreign government could not be sued.
CIMEX has countered that the lower court ruling safeguards congressional intent for a sensitive foreign issue. The defense referred to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, or FSIA.
Justice Neil Gorsuch noted the 1996 law seemed to defer such questions to the president.
“Why would Congress have put that toggle switch in giving the president the opportunity to turn on and off liability if it weren’t concerned there would be international law possible concerns, and it was essentially saying, we’re not doing the FSIA?” he asked.
CIMEX lawyer Jules Lobel argued that “Title III violated international law, extended U.S. territorial jurisdiction in many different controversial ways.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh later followed: “The president has a huge role in the statute. That’s looking at the text. Then you look at the real world of what’s happened since the enactment of the statute, and the president has been front and center. That effect was that those suits couldn’t go forward. The president is the person who can weigh all of that.”
The second case, with the cruise lines as the defendants, is entirely a dispute among private companies, lacking any sovereign immunity questions.
The question is whether a plaintiff must establish a present-day property interest if the assets in question were not monetized. The plaintiff is Havana Docks, a U.S. company that built docks in Havana’s port before the Cuban revolution. The Castro regime revoked the company’s legal right to the docks.
In 2019, the docks company sued four cruise companies that used the confiscated docks from 2016 through 2019; these companies were Royal Caribbean, Carnival, Norwegian Cruise Line, and MSC Cruises.
A lower court found the cruise companies were liable for $440 million. The companies appealed, arguing that they followed the U.S. government’s lead on reopening travel to Cuba, part of the Obama administration’s overtures to Cuba.
Justices both liberal and conservative expressed skepticism toward the docks company, since it was talking about a lease rather than property as traditionally defined.
Justice Clarence Thomas asked what property the plaintiffs were claiming.
“We’re treating it as essentially ownership of a leasehold,” the company’s lawyer Richard Klingler responded. “The facilities themselves are what was seized and are set off limits, but that’s the underlying property. We don’t own the docks other than in the sense of having held a leasehold interest in relation to them.”
Thomas asked, “But you normally don’t think of someone as confiscating a lease.”
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson followed, “It seems to me that property is a defined term here and that the statute itself includes the kinds of interests that you’re talking about.”
Sonia Sotomayor Says Trump Will Have ‘Absolute Power’ If the Court Overturns Humphrey’s Executor
Supreme Court Strikes Down Tariffs Core to Trump Economic Agenda
It Might Surprise You, But Here’s How Harry Reid Helped End Roe
Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE
Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.
The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.
In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.
You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.
The Tony Kinnett Cast
The Daily Signal Podcast
© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies. Learn More .
