Harvard University has been praised for resisting sweeping demands from the Trump administration – an apparent act of courage defending academic freedom and social justice amid political and financial threats.

Threatened by the loss of more than $US2 billion in federal funding, Harvard refused to dismantle diversity programs, restrict student protests or cooperate with immigration enforcement. But is it really just an act of courage?

Look closer and a more calculated picture emerges. Beneath the principled rhetoric lies Harvard’s formidable financial power, legal acumen and a political calculus. With a $US53.2 billion endowment ($83.54 billion), the university can weather the financial fallout, rally donors and mount a robust legal defence.

Sydney University earned 42.6 per cent – nearly $1.5 billion – of its revenue from international student fees in 2023.Credit: Oscar Colman

Multiple US institutions are challenging Trump’s crackdown under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, arguing the administration bypassed due process. A successful court challenge could have the funds restored. Legal experts suggest Harvard is anticipating a favourable court ruling.

There is also a political strategy at work. With US Senate elections set for 2026, Harvard’s resistance may position it well under a future administration.

In contrast, Columbia University chose compliance, caving to Trump’s demands – only to face unprecedented federal oversight regardless. In this light, defiance is not only braver but smarter, as appeasement has proven futile.

For Australia, the real question is: could any Australian university withstand similar pressures? With Peter Dutton adopting Trump-style policies and rhetoric, this is not hypothetical but urgent. The education sector – fostering knowledge, critical thinking and empowered graduates – is a preferred target for right-wing........

© The Age