Judges call out Trump DOJ for “unlawful,” “unethical” and “unseemly” conduct
Reviews Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary? Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting
Getting Hooked on Quitting
Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary?
Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
Is College Necessary?
Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Reviews Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary? Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting
Getting Hooked on Quitting
Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary?
Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
Is College Necessary?
Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Judges call out Trump DOJ for “unlawful,” “unethical” and “unseemly” conduct
Federal judges have criticized the administration's prosecutors in hundreds of cases since Trump took office
Published July 30, 2026 6:00AM (EDT)
This article originally appeared on ProPublica.
Across the country, federal judges are calling out Department of Justice lawyers, questioning in unprecedented ways whether they can be trusted to tell the truth or uphold centuries-old legal norms.
From Washington, D.C., to Rhode Island to Oregon, federal judges nominated by presidents from both parties, including Donald Trump, have zeroed in on what’s called “the presumption of regularity.” It essentially means that judges must presume that the government — whether it be federal prosecutors, an IRS auditor or an FBI agent — did their jobs according to the rules and in good faith.
Until Trump’s second term, which has seen an exodus of veteran DOJ lawyers and a transformative shift in priorities from issues like enforcing civil rights to instead defending a mass deportation agenda, this foundational tenet had rarely been discussed in federal courtrooms, former judges, lawyers and scholars say. But as Trump’s DOJ exhibits behavior that judges have called “unlawful,” “unethical,” “unseemly” or otherwise dishonest, adherence to that bedrock standard is now being questioned.
ProPublica reviewed hundreds of cases since Trump retook the White House in which judges criticized the actions of DOJ lawyers and found more than 40 in which they explicitly referenced the presumption of regularity. In many cases, judges have expressed frustration that they can no longer take the government at its word.
“Judges simply don’t believe the representations that are being made by United States attorneys, assistant United States attorneys and the like,” said John E. Jones, a former federal judge for the District of Pennsylvania, appointed by President George W. Bush.
“I don’t think in the annals of the Department of Justice, in the history of jurisprudence in the United States, we’ve ever seen anything close to this.”
In Rhode Island in May, Trump-appointed federal Judge Mary McElroy rebuked federal prosecutors’ conduct — saying they withheld information and misrepresented facts — as she quashed their requests for a subpoena in their investigation into a........
