Still Just Two Votes (No Evidence of More) for Overruling "Actual Malice" Test in Defamation Cases
The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
About The Volokh Conspiracy Editorial Independence Who we are Books Volokh Daily Email Archives Search DMCA RSS
Free Speech
Still Just Two Votes (No Evidence of More) for Overruling "Actual Malice" Test in Defamation Cases
Eugene Volokh | 6.29.2026 10:37 AM
From today's dissent from the denial of certiorari in Dershowitz v. CNN, Inc., written by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch:
Alan Dershowitz sued respondent, a major news network, alleging that it defamed him. Because Dershowitz is a "public person," our precedents required him to prove not only the elements of common-law defamation, but also that the network acted with "actual malice." See Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974). Predictably, Dershowitz did not prevail under that........
