Even if the technicality is answered, connection can be lost if an unsaid emotional question is not addressed.

Medicine is based on data and science but can be less convincing than emotional stories social media provides.

Considering the question behind the question may help, not only in the office but also in everyday life.

“Is there a supplement I can take? I saw something called Super-Brain Calm online—what do you think?”

“Is there a supplement I can take? I saw something called Super-Brain Calm online—what do you think?”

I hear questions like this almost every day in clinic, and they seem to be accelerating with the era of social media and misinformation. On the surface, they seem like simple requests for information, for expertise, for a clear answer.

Earlier in my career, I would respond the way I was trained:

“I wish we had something like that, but there’s no good scientific evidence to support it.”

“I wish we had something like that, but there’s no good scientific evidence to support it.”

It’s a responsible answer. It’s truthful.

And yet, I could often see it in my patients’ faces—a flicker of disappointment, a subtle withdrawal. The conversation would move on, but something important had been missed.

Over time, I’ve come to realize that questions like this are often not really about supplements. The technical questions they ask may be a clue to their emotional needs.

“Is there........

© Psychology Today