The strength of a con is how long belief survives after the facts turn against it.

Intelligence is no shield. What protects you is which authorities you've chosen to trust.

Once a belief becomes part of your identity, giving it up feels like betraying yourself.

Ask where one of your own beliefs still runs on faith after the evidence stopped supporting it.

A good con artist does not just take your money. He gets you to defend him for taking it.

When Elizabeth Holmes was exposed, many who had believed in Theranos did not turn on her. They blamed the press, the regulators, or the skeptics who would not wait. Holmes was convicted of fraud and sent to prison, yet she still speaks as though the technology could have worked if the world had believed a little longer. The most effective deceivers do not simply fool their marks. They turn them into believers.

There is a way to measure a con, and it has nothing to do with the size of the theft. It is how long belief endures contact with reality. Weak cons collapse the moment the facts arrive. Strong ones keep their believers long after the verdict, sometimes for life. The interesting question is what prolongs that survival and why it should worry any of us.

The profile of a susceptible mark

Start at the weak end. When Bernie Madoff confessed to the largest Ponzi scheme in history, worth roughly $65 billion on paper, the belief died on the spot. A Ponzi is a clean binary: The money is there, or it is not, and it was not. Nothing was left to believe in. Yet notice who his marks were. Banks, charities, and sophisticated financiers who prided themselves on due diligence. Not amateurs. Fraud researcher Tamar Frankel found that many marks share one combination. They distrust established institutions and readily believe an alternative source that flatters what they already want to be true. It is less about intelligence than about which authorities a person has chosen to trust.

The people most........

© Psychology Today