Language once proved a life was behind it, and AI severs that link.

We read machines with reflexes built for human minds.

The problem isn't what AI says but what stands behind it.

In "Social Aims," Emerson wrote, “What you are stands over you the while, and thunders so that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary.” The quote is powerful and often referenced in various iterations. These words suggest, at least to me, something interesting about the output of large language models.

Most of the discussion around AI is framed around intelligence. Is it smart? How smart? Better than here, weaker there? But the more curious feature of these systems may have less to do with intelligence than with ontology. My concern begins when "LLM language" seems to carry so many of the "signals of mind" yet remains detached from the lived experience that gave those signals their human substance.

When Words Carried a Life

Language is attached to life, at least it used to be. We didn't just hear words, we heard a symphony of memory, motive, contradiction, fatigue, hope, vanity, shame, and consequence. And each note plays its role. Even when a person was wrong or insincere, there was still someone there. The words may........

© Psychology Today