US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s Rome visit exposes the contrast between White House fury and papal diplomacy.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio went to Rome on 7 May. He met the Pope. He met Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State. And he met Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Vatican’s foreign minister.

The Vatican communiqué described the meetings as “cordial talks.” Cordial. Not tense, not candid, not difficult. Cordial. A word chosen with diplomatic precision.

That is the heart of the matter. President Donald Trump, on the eve of Rubio’s visit, accused Leo XIV of wanting Iran to obtain nuclear weapons – a crude falsehood, given that the Holy See opposes the possession of nuclear arms. Yet the following day, his secretary of state sat across from the pontiff.

And the meeting concluded with a statement reaffirming the “need to work tirelessly for peace.” Which is precisely the language the president has been attacking.

Trump raises his voice; the Vatican lowers the temperature. And in the restraint of that communiqué, a kind of rhetorical defeat for the White House quietly takes shape. Because accepting that language means acknowledging that the grammar of peace is not a form of weakness. It is terrain on which even Washington, eventually, must agree to walk.

Leo XIV had already said as much with unusual clarity: “If someone wishes to criticise me because I proclaim the Gospel, let him do so with the truth.” Truth. Not opinion, not narrative, not spin. A word that, in the present climate, has come to sound almost exotic.

Rubio himself acknowledged........

© Pearls and Irritations