PAKISTAN’S debate on the formation of new provinces continues to surface with renewed vigour, driven by the practical difficulties of governing a nation whose population now exceeds two hundred and forty million within an administrative framework that has remained largely unchanged since 1970. At present the country comprises four provinces—Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan—alongside the Islamabad Capital Territory and the territories of Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Calls for additional units, whether limited to South Punjab or Hazara or extending to schemes of twelve, fifteen or even thirty provinces, arise from administrative overload, regional disparities, population pressure and a widespread sense that distant provincial capitals cannot respond adequately to local needs.

Those who favour reorganization argue that smaller provinces would reduce the administrative distance between citizens and decision-makers. Capitals such as Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar and Quetta are far from many districts, hindering timely action in health, education, policing and disaster management. New units could tailor policies to regional needs, reduce Punjab’s dominance—which accounts for roughly half the national population—and give under-represented areas a stronger voice in provincial assemblies, the Senate and resource distribution. Development funds and institutions, long concentrated in existing capitals, could be distributed more evenly, while cultural and linguistic identities, particularly those of Seraiki and Hindko speakers, would gain recognition. Smaller governments could also be easier to monitor, potentially strengthening accountability and encouraging broader........

© Pakistan Observer