The Real Reason Elon Musk Keeps Insisting DOGE Cuts Killed “Zero” Kids

In his explosive interview with The Economist, the SpaceX billionaire inadvertently revealed something darker about his true vision for the future—and about his affinities with global fascism.

“Zero died because of DOGE. Zero. Point. Zero.”

That remarkable claim is from Elon Musk’s interview last week with The Economist, in which he reiterated one of his favorite new claims: His Department of Government Efficiency’s huge cuts to international humanitarian aid did not result in the death of any children abroad. This isn’t meant as a vague or hyperbolic exaggeration. Musk’s assertion is quite emphatically that not a single child—or even a fraction of a child, as his strange “zero point zero” formulation suggests—died due to these DOGE cuts.

Musk’s Economist interview is getting attention for outsized predictions and meltdown moments: He insisted AI will surpass human intelligence in only five years and seethed to his interviewer, Economist editor Zanny Minton Beddoes, that “people loathe you.” But we think Musk’s claims about DOGE and children capture something darker that’s  been overlooked: The global far right is operating within a mode of language and communication that many liberals simply don’t understand. We’ve got to get better at grasping it—and countering it.

Musk’s assertion that “zero died” came in this striking, extended exchange: 

.@elonmusk says zero people died from DOGE cuts to USAID. The billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, in his own words, helped feed the policy to the woodchipper last year, when he was the head of America’s Department of Government Efficiency. In an exclusive interview, @zannymb,… pic.twitter.com/BilkbWrJHF— The Economist (@TheEconomist) July 23, 2026

.@elonmusk says zero people died from DOGE cuts to USAID. The billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, in his own words, helped feed the policy to the woodchipper last year, when he was the head of America’s Department of Government Efficiency. In an exclusive interview, @zannymb,… pic.twitter.com/BilkbWrJHF

But it’s all nonsense. Researchers have documented hundreds of thousands of deaths. A USAID whistleblower revealed that the agency itself projected that the cuts would unleash immense human suffering. Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times recently documented specific, concrete cases of people who died in Africa of malaria, HIV, and other maladies due to DOGE-driven reductions in medical supplies and aid workers.

“After visiting numerous impoverished villages,” Kristof concluded, “aid cuts are unquestionably costing the lives of many children.”

When pressed by Beddoes on the havoc the cuts have unleashed, Musk dissembled. He insisted that humanitarian aid has been transferred to the State Department, which, even if true, is specious: Only a small fraction of that aid was left to get transferred in the first place. As refugee advocate Jeremy Konyndyk told us, “you’ve still got huge ruptures in basic services.”

Musk also insisted DOGE can’t be blamed because other NGOs or private foundations could have made up the........

© New Republic