Punjab’s official account describes compulsory collection on specified scheduled assets; the State Bank’s 2026 circular separately addresses deductions from specified bank accounts.3 We are proposing institutional improvement, not discovering an institution that Pakistan lacks.

Its findings highlight preferences for direct giving and distrust of state institutions.6 This does not establish how much additional money a reformed public fund would receive.

These passages establish the historical and institutional discussion acknowledged here; they do not establish an optimal Pakistani tax rate.

A family buying necessities and an owner accumulating wealth do not meet the state on equal terms. Consumption is visible whenever money changes hands. Ownership can remain sheltered behind exemptions, opaque valuations and political influence. A fiscal system that repeatedly reaches the first while accommodating the second cannot become just merely by collecting more efficiently. Our search for an alternative must begin with that imbalance.

Part III distinguished property, wealth and returns. Zakat and Ushr now require equally careful treatment. Their relevance lies in the proposition that possession carries obligations towards others. Their credibility depends on institutions that honour those obligations. Invoking familiar religious language will achieve little if the money enters another opaque fund and the recipient must seek a favour to obtain assistance.

This discussion also sharpens our disagreement with Dr. Ehtisham Ahmad and other advocates of consumption-tax reform. Dr. Ehtisham Ahmad’s 2024 paper recognises colonial inheritance, post-Independence centralisation and geopolitical rents. It also recognises that Pakistan’s general sales tax (GST) operated as a production excise. These are substantial admissions.1

The question is whether the proposed remedies adequately confront the distribution of economic power, the experience of taxpayers and the conditions under which public institutions earn trust.

Our earlier series, When VAT ceases to be VAT, [Minute Mirror, August 25, 2025] identified the practical failure. Value added tax (VAT) depends on credit for business inputs and timely refunds. Where legitimate credit is denied, tax becomes a business cost; where refunds are delayed, producers finance the state. Gross withholding can compound that burden. A digital platform cannot repair those defects unless the underlying rules and incentives change.2

The same discipline must govern the alternative. Zakat is not a convenient label for a charge on every asset. A Zakatable base requires rules about eligible wealth, thresholds, ownership, liabilities and holding periods.

The familiar 2.5% rate cannot simply be multiplied by national wealth, still less by gross domestic product. Punjab’s official account describes compulsory collection on specified scheduled assets; the State Bank’s 2026 circular separately addresses deductions from specified bank accounts.3 We are proposing institutional improvement, not discovering an institution that Pakistan lacks.

Ushr requires a separate agricultural assessment. A crop is a........

© Minute Mirror