Indonesia–Saudi power play: Why ACWA–Danantara must move beyond the MoU
When ACWA Power and Danantara signed a $10 billion agreement in Jeddah, it marked more than a bilateral milestone. It signaled growing confidence among Gulf investors that their capital, expertise, and project models can scale beyond the Middle East.
The scope is undeniably ambitious, spanning renewable energy, combined-cycle gas, green hydrogen, and water desalination—areas where ACWA Power has built a strong global reputation as a developer and operator. But ambition is not execution, and execution is where this partnership will ultimately be judged.
By definition, the memorandum of understanding (MoU) is a framework. It expresses intent to explore investments, not a binding commitment to build them. This distinction is critical. Across emerging markets, many large-scale infrastructure partnerships stall at precisely this stage, caught between political alignment and actual delivery.
For Gulf investors, this challenge is familiar. Over decades, the region has refined a model of infrastructure development built on clarity: defined sites, long-term offtake agreements, bankable contracts, and centralized decision-making. That model has delivered some of the world’s largest solar, desalination, and power projects on time and at scale.
Exporting it, however, requires more than capital—it requires adaptation to local realities.
READ: Indonesia and the Gulf must do more than soft power in a time of war
Indonesia presents both opportunity and complexity. It is one of Asia’s fastest-growing energy........
