By Khurshed Peer

The Epstein Files raise a provocative question: would the world react the same way if the accused were named Mohammad or Ahmad?

This scenario forces society to confront uncomfortable truths about accountability, justice, and media bias.

As public scrutiny grows, it sparks debates on how race and religion trigger reactions to high-profile legal cases.

Epstein’s network of corruption, exploitation, and power struggles shocked the globe, but imagining an alternative highlights a crucial point: would similar allegations against individuals from other cultural or religious backgrounds receive the same protection, or even admiration, from certain circles?

This comparison encourages a closer look at the systemic biases that shape stories and public discussions.

The U.S. government initially tried to shift the story of the Epstein Files by painting Iranian leaders as villains, but the media’s efforts didn’t succeed.

Then, in a surprising twist, Americans took significant action in 2026. In response, the U.S. government launched disinformation campaigns, including staged protests designed to influence public opinion in Iran, to distract attention from the Epstein Files.

Lately, Americans have attempted to spread false claims about the Iranian government’s shortcomings in........

© Kashmir Observer