Your Best Employees Aren’t Leaving for More Money. They’re Leaving Because of These ‘Minor’ Decisions

The real reason great employees leave is a pattern of small signals that trust, appreciation, or opportunity are declining.

Founders often assume their best employees leave for bigger salaries or flashy offers. In reality, many leave because of a series of small leadership decisions that quietly signal they’re no longer valued.

Startups and growth-stage companies are constantly optimizing for margin and efficiency. Cutting unnecessary expenses and tightening operations is part of scaling. Minor policy changes here, small operational additions there. Each is insignificant in and of itself.

Each decision makes sense in isolation. Together, they send a very different message to your team: profit matters more than the people producing it. Over the years, I’ve watched founders lose exceptional employees over decisions that looked harmless in a spreadsheet.

Cutting incentives “just a little”

I’ve seen founders try to improve margins by reducing the sales team’s commission rate by “only” 1 percent on a specific low-ticket product.

How Anthropic's Claude AI Became a Co-Founder

Their logic was sound: it helps pad margins on a low-income-generating product.

But the message to the sales team was clear: the same time commitment and sales process to close that low-ticket product now reaps less reward. The work stays the same, but the reward shrinks. And small changes to compensation rarely feel small to the people whose income depends on them.

When adjusting incentive structures, monetary or otherwise, it’s important to include those affected by the changes in the discussion or process, when possible. Imperatively, any structure adjustment must benefit both sides, with the benefit for your team clearly communicated and demonstrated.

© Inc.com