3 Ways the Supreme Court’s Tariff Decision Impacts Small Businesses

While the decision did not end the trade debate, it did give small businesses a more stable framework to build, hire, and grow.

BY ELIZABETH GORE, CO-FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT @ELIZABETHGOREUS

In a recent ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a decision with sweeping implications for entrepreneurs. It ruled that the President cannot rely on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs. For small business owners, this decision is not theoretical. It is personal. 

Small businesses and the impact of Trump’s tariffs 

Over the past several years, founders across the country have navigated sudden cost increases, supply chain disruptions, and margin compression tied to tariffs imposed under emergency authority. My company, Hello Alice, has heard directly from thousands of entrepreneurs forced to delay hiring, raise prices, or freeze expansion as costs shifted overnight. 

Beth Benike, founder of Busy Baby, publicly shared how tariff uncertainty forced her to halt imports from China. It dramatically altered her growth trajectory and strained cash flow. Jamila and Alfonso Wright, co-founders of Brooklyn Tea, built their brand around globally sourced teas and community spaces. Sudden import costs turned what should have been strategic sourcing into a high-risk financial calculation. 

These are not isolated stories. They reflect the broader strain policy volatility places on small teams operating with limited margins and limited cushion. 

How Canva Became the Power Player in the AI Design Wars

Neal Katyal, Supreme Court lawyer and small business advocate, led the case against Trumps tariffs. Its outcome may reshape the operating environment for millions of entrepreneurs. Here are three major ways the decision will impact small businesses: 

1. Greater predictability in pricing and supply chains 

Small businesses live and die by predictability. A surprise 10% to 75% tariff on imported components or finished goods can erase profits overnight. Larger corporations can hedge risk, diversify sourcing across continents, or absorb short-term losses. A 20-person retailer or manufacturer cannot. 

By ruling that IEEPA cannot be used to impose broad tariffs, the Court reduces the likelihood of sudden, unilateral trade actions. Tariffs are not eliminated, but they must now move through clearer statutory channels. That means more debate, more notice, and more time for entrepreneurs to adjust pricing, contracts, and inventory strategies. For founders planning six to 12 months ahead, that procedural guardrail matters. 

© Inc.com