The Dark Side Of Remittances
Every year, millions of Pakistanis working in the Gulf, Europe, and North America send part of their wages home. A labourer in Dubai paying for his children’s education. A shopkeeper in Birmingham helping his family build a house back home. A driver in Riyadh covering his brother’s hospital bills. Multiply these private acts of care by millions, and you get one of the largest financial flows in Pakistan’s economy: remittances.
The numbers are remarkable. Pakistan’s remittance inflows increased from about USD 1.4 billion in 2001 to more than USD 25 billion by 2020. By 2024, the country ranked among the world’s five largest remittance recipients, receiving nearly USD 35 billion. Today, remittances account for more than 8 percent of GDP, exceeding foreign direct investment and foreign aid combined. They are no longer a side story—they are the lifeline that is keeping Pakistan’s economy afloat.
Figure 1. Remittance inflows to Pakistan, 2001–2020 (USD billions)
Source: World Bank remittance data, as reported in Ali et al. (2026).
For good reason, remittances have long been viewed as an economic blessing. Successive governments have celebrated each new remittance record as evidence of resilience and have made increasing these inflows a policy priority. The evidence supporting that optimism is overwhelming. Studies from Pakistan and other developing countries consistently show that remittances help families escape poverty by easing financial constraints.
Households receiving money from abroad spend more on education and healthcare, accumulate more assets, invest more in businesses, and are better protected against economic shocks. In a country where formal insurance mechanisms are scarce and public safety nets remain limited, remittances have become an informal insurance system for millions of families.
The question we have been missing
Most research has focused on what remittances do for households. Far less attention has been paid to what they do to regions. A force that improves the lives of individual families can still widen the gap between districts if migration opportunities themselves are unevenly........
