menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

William Watson: The U.S.-Iran war by the numbers

18 0
14.04.2026

Share this Story : Financial Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

William Watson: The U.S.-Iran war by the numbers

The U.S. lost one person for every 1,000 sorties it flew against Iranian targets and its tolerance for POWs was zero. War is different now

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Two: Number of countries now blockading the Strait of Hormuz, versus zero on Feb. 27, the day before the U.S.-Israel-Iran war started. The second blockade (the American one) is conditional. If the first (the Iranian) stops, the second will, too, unless the two countries work out a deal for joint tolling of ships, as the U.S. president recently suggested might be possible.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.

Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.

Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.

Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.

Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

One: Number of American prisoners of war the U.S. could not tolerate, as demonstrated by its risking the lives of hundreds of other service people to rescue pilots downed in the Iranian mountains. Devotion of such resources and risk to saving just two lives is morale-boosting for U.S. warriors: we will not abandon you, it tells them. But can a country that puts such a high premium on casualties and captures really fight wars? Before instant world-wide communication came along pain thresholds were different.

Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

245:Number of Americans killed on the deadliest day of the Vietnam War, Jan. 31, 1968, at the height of the Communists’ Tet offensive.

2,415:Number of Americans killed in the deadliest month of the Vietnam War, May 1968.

2,500: Number of Americans killed on D-Day: June 6, 1944. A dramatic decline in the toleration of death — of one’s own soldiers, at least, though not necessarily of opponents’ — is probably a good thing.

13: Number of U.S. military personnel killed up to last Tuesday’s ceasefire, six in a mid-air refuelling accident, the rest in Iranian rocket and drone attacks.

13,000: Total number of U.S. sorties flown against Iran. How many sorties do you suppose the U.S. would need to wipe out our military? It attacked 10,000 separate Iranian targets. How many military targets do we have? Has there ever been a conflict in which the number of sorties was 1,000 times the number of casualties incurred making them? How about Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941, when the Japanese navy achieved complete surprise in its attempt to sink the U.S. Pacific fleet, which it almost succeeded in doing?

William Watson: Armageddon postponed, now back to dairy quotas and CUSMA

William Watson: Open the highway, you crazy New Brunswickers!

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

29: Number of Japanese planes shot down at Pearl Harbor, which was roughly seven per cent of those involved in the attack.

129: Number of Japanese sailors and airmen killed at Pearl Harbor. (Number captured: one, the 23-year-old captain of a midget submarine).

2,403: Total American deaths at Pearl Harbor, military and civilian.

55,573: Number of British Bomber Command crewmen killed during strategic bombing of Germany, 1942-45, a casualty rate of 44.4 per cent. (Eighteen per cent of the 55,000 — almost 10,000 — were Canadian.) The demographics of aerial bombardment have clearly changed in 80 years.

Posthaste: Canadian dollar is being dumped from FX reserves at a record pace. What's going on? News

Posthaste: Canadian dollar is being dumped from FX reserves at a record pace. What's going on?

Forcing people to pay a moral tax if they leave the country won't inspire them to stay Personal Finance

Forcing people to pay a moral tax if they leave the country won't inspire them to stay

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Travel data from March show number of Canadians returning from trips across the U.S. border are stuck at depressed levels Economy

Travel data from March show number of Canadians returning from trips across the U.S. border are stuck at depressed levels

Canada needs to invest $1.8 trillion over the next decade in six key sectors, says RBC News

Canada needs to invest $1.8 trillion over the next decade in six key sectors, says RBC

Bank of Canada likely to stay put for now, says Paul Beaudry Economy

Bank of Canada likely to stay put for now, says Paul Beaudry

30,000 (est.): Number of Iranians killed in December and January during widespread protests against the governing regime and its failed economic policies — though estimates vary between 3,000 and the 45,000 the U.S. president recently claimed. Whatever the true number, what was clearly slaughter prompted Donald Trump’s “HELP IS ON ITS WAY” post of Jan. 13, which he carried through on, albeit with a six-week delay — understandable when aircraft carriers have to be moved many thousands of miles.

40 (est.): Number of Iranian leaders “taken out” in first minutes of war. How many among them were responsible for ordering the 30,000 (or 3,000 or 45,000) deaths? What would be the effect on the U.S. if its 40 most important leaders were “taken out” (and who would such leaders be, exactly)? Would the U.S. cease to function? Would Americans be more or less likely to resist whatever entity was responsible for the “taking out”? Bonus question: How would the average age of the U.S. top 40 compare with the average age of the late Iranian top 40?

6,000 (est.): Age in years of Persian (Iranian) civilization.

46: Number of U.S. presidents since the election of George Washington in 1789 who never threatened to end a civilization, not even a small one.

47th: The number of the U.S. president who did.

47: Number of years of Iran’s “Death to America, Death to Israel” administration.

Three: Number of the world war U.S. President Donald Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy he was risking by resisting Russia’s attempted takeover of his country. What are the odds that a generalized war in the Middle East, including the possible seizure of oil tankers bound for China and Russia, maybe even accompanied by Chinese or Russian warships, could prompt the same event?

Zero: Chance that anyone commenting on the current state of the war or its likely outcome knows how everything will turn out. As the Wall Street Journal’s Holman Jenkins, Jr., recently reminded us all: “The future is unknowable and so is the path untaken.” Hands up, everyone with good information about what’s going on in Iran right now. Mossad may know, but it’s not saying. Yes, Donald Trump does improv. But improv doesn’t always fail. Fan of TACO: Trump always chickens out? How about TABOO: Trump always backs off — once.

Share this Story : Financial Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.


© Financial Post