The author argues Mogadishu cannot function as a neutral national capital under current arrangements because of its clan-war history and “Madax-ka-Nool” (one-man-rule) politics, and that federal member states are now copying the center’s worst habits.

2026 constitutional amendments purporting to settle Benadir’s capital status are dismissed as unilateral and illegitimate without federation-wide consent, failing the caution built into Article 9 of the 2012 Provisional Constitution.

Somalia’s real choices are either genuine neutralization of the capital (residency-based governance, national security control, limits on clan advantage) or relocating the federal seat; continuing the status quo, the piece says, threatens federal unity.

This op-ed advances a conclusion that Somali political culture has so far refused to reach: Mogadishu, as currently constituted, cannot function as a national capital compatible with federal governance, democratic accountability or the long-term survival of Somalia as a unified state. The question before the country is no longer whether to change Mogadishu’s status. It is which of two available remedies Somalia has the political courage to pursue — a genuinely new constitutional status that extracts the city from its clan foxhole character once and for all, or the relocation of the federal seat of government to ground that does not carry Mogadishu’s historical burden. This piece argues that both options are more honest than what Somalia has tried so far, and that the status quo is the one choice the country can no longer afford.

For three decades, Mogadishu has stood as the permanent address of Somali misrule — the place where a state collapsed, where clans turned on one another, and where the machinery of national government now sits atop ground still unsettled by its own history. The deeper tragedy of 2026 is not that Mogadishu remains scarred. It is that Somalia’s federal member states, created in part to escape the center’s pathologies, are beginning to reproduce them. The disease has a name that every Somali recognizes: Madax-ka-Nool — one-man-rule — and it has spread from the capital to the periphery like wildfire.

A capital built on a wound

The record is not in dispute, however uncomfortable it remains to state plainly. When the United Somali Congress (USC) seized Mogadishu in January 1991 and President Siad Barre fled south, the city did not pass peacefully into a new order — and the USC did not arrive at an intact enemy. The regime they finished was already mortally wounded, and the wound had been inflicted over more than a decade by the Somali Salvation Democratic Front (SSDF).

Every Somali community suffered under Barre’s regime. But the historical record is unambiguous on this point: the Majeerteen and the Isaaq bore the earliest and heaviest blows of his state terror, and their resistance lit the fuse that ultimately destroyed him.

The SSDF was the first organized armed resistance to Siad Barre, founded in 1978 by Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed and fellow officers following a failed coup attempt in the aftermath of the Ogaden War’s catastrophic defeat. Barre’s reprisals against the Majeerteen were immediate and savage. His Red Berets descended on Mudugh, systematically smashing water reservoirs across the Galkayo, Garowe and Jeriban districts to deny water to Majeerteen subclans and their herds. In May and June 1979, more than 2,000 people died of thirst alone. Women were raped, livestock slaughtered, schools and hospitals shuttered, trade banned. It was not punishment — it was extermination by policy.

The SSDF’s founders drew the correct lesson from that atrocity: no single clan could bring down the regime alone. The mission from its founding was explicitly pan-Somali — a call to every oppressed community to recognize a common enemy and rise together. The SSDF succeeded in that mission. It set the template and fired the inspiration for the resistance movements that followed, stretching Barre’s military and moral authority to breaking point across more than a decade of guerrilla warfare. In the summer of 1982, SSDF fighters joined Ethiopian forces in a major border offensive that temporarily seized territory inside Somalia. What the SSDF could not survive, however, was not Barre’s army — it was the treachery of its Ethiopian patron. When Barre and Mengistu Haile Mariam signed a peace accord in 1988 obliging each side to cease supporting the other’s armed opposition, Ethiopia shut down SSDF camps, seized the movement’s weapons, arrested its leaders — including Abdullahi Yusuf himself — and silenced its radio station. Personnel were lost not to Barre’s bullets but to Ethiopian detention and the collapse of their operational base. By 1991, the SSDF........

© Eurasia Review