In most South Asian households, and in many cultures that share its instinct for order, there is a word that does more social work than almost any other: “shareef”. It means respectable, decent, well-behaved, the kind of person who does not cause a scene. It is offered as the highest compliment a family can pay, and it is also, quietly, one of the most effective mechanisms ever invented for keeping people small. The cult of being shareef is not really about virtue. It is about legibility. A shareef person is predictable. They can be placed at a dinner table, introduced to relatives, presented to a marriage broker or a business partner, without risk of surprise. Their value lies not in what they contain but in what they do not do; they do not argue too loudly, do not dress too boldly, do not want too visibly, do not ask questions that make elders uncomfortable. Respectability, in this framework, is a negative virtue, defined entirely by absence.

A woman’s respectability has historically functioned as a kind of collateral for the family’s honour.

A woman’s respectability has historically functioned as a kind of collateral for the family’s honour.

Women bear the heaviest weight of this cult, and it’s worth being honest about why. A woman’s respectability has historically functioned as a kind of collateral for the family’s honour. Her modesty was never fully her own; it belonged to her father, then her husband, then her sons, a shared asset that could be depleted by a laugh that carried too far down the street or an opinion voiced too firmly in mixed company. This is why the vocabulary of control around women is so often dressed in the language of........

© Daily Times