Stephen Miller and the Making of the Fascist Subject
White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller speaking at the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. Photo: Gage Skidmore. CC BY-SA 2.0
Stephen Miller, Trump’s White House Deputy Chief of Staff, is a well-documented white nationalist and one of the most influential architects behind Trump’s racist policies. Miller has long aligned himself with far-right media and extremist figures. His outspoken opposition to DACA and his calls to end Temporary Protected Status for predominantly nonwhite populations further expose his deeply entrenched racism. His attacks on international students, higher education, immigrants, and anyone who refuses to conform to his notion of white nationalism and racialized citizenship reveal a politics of vengeance, in which the full force of the federal government is weaponized against difference. His bigotry is so notorious that even his own family members have publicly denounced him.
A central player in this regime of state terrorism, systemic racism, mass arrests, deportations, and the criminalization of dissent, Miller has been the driving force behind Trump’s most repressive policies. During Trump’s first term, he authored the Muslim ban, the family separation policy, and assaults on birthright citizenship, all rooted in an unapologetic white supremacist and eugenicist worldview. In Trump’s second term, he has emerged as the architect of even more draconian measures, pushing for mass deportations, the abolition of birthright citizenship, and the revocation of naturalized citizenship for those who fall outside his white Christian vision of who deserves to be called American.
Jonathan Blitzer, writing in The New Yorker, understates the depth of Miller’s white supremacist ideology and his virulent hatred of immigrants when he observes that “Miller’s obsession with restricting immigration and punishing immigrants has become the defining characteristic of the Trump White House.” While Blitzer’s comment was made during Trump’s first presidency, it is now clear that Miller was already the chief architect of an emerging police state, a project that has since come fully into view.
Under his influence, the machinery of ICE became an instrument of fear and racial terror. Immigration agents, emboldened by his rhetoric, harassed, detained, and abducted immigrants, those marked by Black and Brown bodies, whose very presence were treated as crimes in themselves. Policy mutated into performance, and speech was weaponized into ritual. ICE’s so-called “enforcement operations” escalated with chilling precision, raiding restaurants, farms, and workplaces across the country, with arrests at times exceeding two thousand a day. What began as administrative enforcement metastasized into a politics of intimidation and spectacle, a calculated display of power designed to criminalize vulnerability and render compassion suspect.
Such orchestrated brutality reflected not only Miller’s ideology but also his personality. Even his former colleagues described him as insufferable, “rude, arrogant, and consumed by a sense of his own superiority,” as Yahoo News reported. On Capitol Hill, he was widely despised, his every interaction marked by condescension and spite. The disdain he showed toward others in conversation mirrored the disdain he codified into law. Miller’s character became policy: arrogance translated into authoritarianism, contempt into cruelty, and his appetite for domination into the scaffolding of a police state.
Miller’s very being evokes the cold mechanization of a machine, a body turned against itself, moving without rhythm, empathy, or grace. His........
