menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Dyer: Has post-war generation forgotten how hard-won peace is?

9 0
17.04.2026

Share this Story : Windsor Star Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Dyer: Has post-war generation forgotten how hard-won peace is?

Post-WW2 slaughter, the solution settled on was simple: changing borders by force is against the law; attacking another country is a crime.

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Eighty years ago, we set out to drain the swamp. At least 50 million people were dead after the greatest war in history, around half the cities in the northern hemisphere had been smashed flat, and the first nuclear weapons had just been dropped on Japanese cities.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Windsor Star ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.

Get exclusive access to the Windsor Star ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.

Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.

Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

People were in shock. They hadn’t known how destructive war could get, and now they realized the next big war would be incomparably worse: nuclear war. So, they decided the goal must be not to win wars, but to end war.

Don’t think they were naive. They were having this conversation standing hip-deep in the wreckage of the last war. Many of them had fought in it, and almost all of them had lost people close to them. So, between 1945 and 1948, they wrote new rules that made war illegal.

Early in my career as a journalist, I interviewed quite a lot of these people, and what struck me was the brutal realism most of them brought to the project. No airy-fairy stuff about brotherhood and peace, just hard-nosed calculations about how to contain or thwart the large number of countries which had designs on their neighbours.

They decided the key issue was territory, because that’s what the great majority of wars have been about, not just in historical times, but also in pre-historic times and even in the pre-human past.

The Middle East wars of the past 75 years are all ultimately about the division of Palestine between Jews and Arabs in 1948. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is entirely about bringing at least the Slavic parts of the old Soviet Union back under Moscow’s control. India-Pakistan, North Korea-South Korea … there’s an endless supply.

The solution they settled on was simple. From then on, it will be against the law to change a border by force. Attacking another country will be a crime.

Dyer: Trump running out of options in Iran

Dyer: Orban, punished by the aging gods, likely to get punished in the polls

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Yes, this was unfair to countries that lost territory in the past and want it back, but that’s the only way to break the cycle.

Border changes by negotiation and compromise are permissible, but conquest is over. Past grievances have to stay in the past, or else we will end up fighting nuclear wars.

We may not be able to stop every conquest, especially if the violator is a great power, but the rest of us will never acknowledge that what the aggressor has seized is really his.

It was not a perfect solution. It didn’t even address the problem of guerilla wars and civil wars inside a single country, mainly because they were unlikely to cause a nuclear world war. But it did the job.

No nuclear weapon has been used in war for 80 years. No great power has fought any other great power directly since 1953. (Proxies are sometimes employed.)

We have been far more successful that anyone dared to hope in 1945. Even the number of deaths in war have fallen in every decade since then — until now.

'It becomes insane' — Canadian industrial parts manufacturers hit with punishing new U.S. tariff costs Local News

'It becomes insane' — Canadian industrial parts manufacturers hit with punishing new U.S. tariff costs

Windsor police investigate 2-car crash that killed pedestrian Local News

Windsor police investigate 2-car crash that killed pedestrian

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Over developer's warnings, Amherstburg pushes General Amherst heritage protection Local News

Over developer's warnings, Amherstburg pushes General Amherst heritage protection

Spitfires sweep Firebirds to continue path of 2010 Memorial Cup championship team Sports

Spitfires sweep Firebirds to continue path of 2010 Memorial Cup championship team

'Someone else needs a crack at it' — Hilda MacDonald not seeking reelection as Essex County warden Local News

'Someone else needs a crack at it' — Hilda MacDonald not seeking reelection as Essex County warden

The problem, I suspect, is generational turnover. The generation who wrote the new rules is long gone, but as recently as the 1990s I would regularly get lectured about the importance of the international rule of law (code for the above rules) by diplomats at both the State Department in Washington and the Foreign Ministry in Moscow.

The general public always was hazy about the rules that gave us this long peace, but the people who ran the system continued to understand what the basic deal was. However, I don’t hear these arguments any more. The line has gone dead.

We set out to drain the swamp and we made some progress, but now we have lost the plot.

Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist based in London, England and author of the book The Shortest History of War.

Share this Story : Windsor Star Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.


© Windsor Star