menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Candace Owens debated Charlie Kirk’s murder. Who’s investigating the death of truth?

10 0
23.08.2026

Debate has always been a crucial part of any democratic system. 

Even the Founding Fathers, including John Adams, argued that a republic could only survive if its people were educated enough, and free enough, to argue through their disagreements rather than have decisions imposed on them from above. 

Stop blaming corruption. Washington’s real problem is basic arithmetic

Trump and House Democrats are making the same fatal mistake on defense

‘Learn to code’ is dead: Gen Z is picking up a wrench

That idea still holds. What’s changed is social media, which has replaced substance with virality — turning debate into a popularity contest instead of a pursuit of truth. 

For many modern debates, the focus is no longer on listening to the other perspective or reaching some kind of common ground. Instead, debate has increasingly become a sport — a tit-for-tat contest where the goal is to score a viral moment that can be clipped and posted on TikTok.

But this also highlights a broader problem: Not everything needs to be debated simply for the sake of debating. A real debate needs a clear contention and some purpose behind it, not just an ungrounded claim. And even with a clear objective, you should still ask: Can this........

© Washington Examiner